> Which is now linked to from wiki.flightgear.org.
>
> Josh
Where?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
> Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short test
with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ... i didn't see anything
like you observed. The memory consumption was quite stable a
Hello all,
Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
After using all my real ram fg starts gobbling through VM at
about 1 mb every 5 seconds or so, even when flying around the
same area.
LeeE
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:11:27 +0200 (CEST), Joacim wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Mathias Fr�hlich wrote:
>
> > Given the error message, I could imagine a that the attached patch
> > helps. Can you please tell me if that patch helps?
>
> Compiled without a warning o
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Given the error message, I could imagine a that the attached patch helps.
Can you please tell me if that patch helps?
Compiled without a warning on mat.cxx now.
(Was that all? Couldn't handle that method as inline?)
... I tested with gcc-4.1.1 an
Hi,
On Friday 16 June 2006 14:30, Joacim Persson wrote:
> >>From talking to others on IRC I understand the cvs version of simgear
> >> builds
>
> fine with gcc 4, but with gcc 3.3.6 I get these compile errors added below.
> Is there a simple workaround for this?
Given the error message, I could
On Friday 16 June 2006 10:18, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Erik Hofman -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:51:
> >> I think it's best to use the default functions supplied by the system
> >> libraries (in this case lrintf() ? )
> >
> > lrintf is c99 according to the man page, and so it ro
Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
> I have created a web page with minimalistic usage instruction about the way
> the ac3d Blender exporter plugin works with Blender material definitions. It
> can be usefull for newbees who do not like to struggle with all the
> unnecessary Blender material attributes.
>
Hi,
didn't get the Sukhoi yet. I only have a FG 0.9.9 installation, hope
it'll work with that one!I'd sure want to give it a try. My dad has
flown the Su, so I'd have him take a look at it as well.
Ciao
TH
flying.toaster wrote:
> Did you get the Sukhoi ?
>
> If you want I can send you a slig
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Another tip :
> If you can find the file named ac3d_export.cfg ( on windows, in
> C:\Program Files\Blender
> Foundation\Blender\.blender\scripts\bpydata\config ) you can set
> MIRCOL_AS_EMIS to True ( default False ). Then, you can change the 3
> components of the emis co
Did you get the Sukhoi ?
If you want I can send you a slightly updated model...
rgrds
Enrique
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Roberto Inzerillo wrote :
> I have created a web page with minimalistic usage instruction about the way
> the ac3d Blender exporter plugin works with Blender material definitions. It
> can be usefull for newbees who do not like to struggle with all the
> unnecessary Blender material attributes.
Roberto Inzerillo schrieb:
> I have created a web page with minimalistic usage instruction about the way
> the ac3d Blender exporter plugin works with Blender material definitions. It
> can be usefull for newbees who do not like to struggle with all the
> unnecessary Blender material attributes.
I have created a web page with minimalistic usage instruction about the way the
ac3d Blender exporter plugin works with Blender material definitions. It can be
usefull for newbees who do not like to struggle with all the unnecessary
Blender material attributes.
I guess that will help people not
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>> If I understand it correctly it should be possible to simulate the
>> effects of downwash by creating a function of flap-settings and airspeed
>> (and possible alpha), no?
>
> Maybe. I haven't thought about that much, yet. Try it. ;-)
I did try something like this, but
> Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> >> Isn't downwash just a matter of a high angel-of-attack?
>
> > When air passes over the wing, an incremental downward redirection is
> > induced, so the horizontal tail sees a different airflow than the wing.
>
> Oh, downwash of the aircraft itself. I was thinking becau
>From talking to others on IRC I understand the cvs version of simgear builds
fine with gcc 4, but with gcc 3.3.6 I get these compile errors added below. Is
there a simple workaround for this?
In file included from mat.cxx:44:
../../../simgear/structure/SGSharedPtr.hxx: In member function `void
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>> Isn't downwash just a matter of a high angel-of-attack?
> When air passes over the wing, an incremental downward redirection is
> induced, so the horizontal tail sees a different airflow than the wing.
Oh, downwash of the aircraft itself. I was thinking because of wind but
> Isn't downwash just a matter of a high angel-of-attack?
>
> Erik
When air passes over the wing, an incremental downward redirection is
induced, so the horizontal tail sees a different airflow than the wing.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Fli
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:54:39 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> >> ..another big deal to dig up: Downwash.
> >
> > There may end up being some things that don't get specifically
> > addressed, but must be defined by the user with functions and
> > tables.
Curtis L. Olson wrote :
> Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
>> SourceForge has kindly removed all but 5 subscribers to the
>> simgear-cvslogs mailing list. I have no idea what happened or why.
>>
>> If you would like to receive commit log messages for the SimGear
>> sub-project, then please go to the
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sent: 16 June 2006 10:26
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot Bug/Feature
>
> På 16.06.2006 10:19 CEST skrev
På 16.06.2006 10:19 CEST skrev Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
snip...
>I also have a patch prepared which prevents xmlauto.cxx from generating
>spurious instruments, and which uses whichever Heading Indicator that is
>present. That's probably a 'fancy waistcoat', and I'm still pondering if
>it
Erik Hofman a écrit :
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
>> * Erik Hofman -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:51:
>>
>>> I think it's best to use the default functions supplied by the system
>>> libraries (in this case lrintf() ? )
>>>
>> lrintf is c99 according to the man page, and so it roundf().
>>
Curt wrote
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > There is one - nearly - as I said orientation/heading-magnetic-deg. But
> it's
> > not derived from an instrument, and therefore has no supply, neither can
> it
> > fail, not does it have any error. Further, use of such a property will
> not
> > stop, AFAIKS
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:51:
>> I think it's best to use the default functions supplied by the system
>> libraries (in this case lrintf() ? )
>
> lrintf is c99 according to the man page, and so it roundf().
> (int)rintf() then?
Hmm, I doubt this will be fas
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:51:
> I think it's best to use the default functions supplied by the system
> libraries (in this case lrintf() ? )
lrintf is c99 according to the man page, and so it roundf().
(int)rintf() then?
m.
___
Flightge
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
>> ..another big deal to dig up: Downwash.
>
> There may end up being some things that don't get specifically addressed,
> but must be defined by the user with functions and tables. What I'd like
> most to do is to provide all the basic building blocks needed so that the
> us
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:41:>
>> BTW: I'd like to move Cockpit/hud_opts.hxx elsewhere. Don't know what
>> the assembler parts do, but the fallback implies that it's a quick
>> rounding function.
>
> Or is it not worth at all to be done in assember nowaday
* Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:41:>
> BTW: I'd like to move Cockpit/hud_opts.hxx elsewhere. Don't know what
> the assembler parts do, but the fallback implies that it's a quick
> rounding function.
Or is it not worth at all to be done in assember nowadays?
m.
__
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 16 June 2006 09:34:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > becomes too (both exist currently
> > for the same thing in different HUD elements,
> > which hinders abstraction)
>
> It think it would be best to use and jus
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> becomes too (both exist currently
> for the same thing in different HUD elements,
> which hinders abstraction)
It think it would be best to use and just like most of
the other configurations (sound/animati
32 matches
Mail list logo
