Hi,
Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> O.k. I understand now slowly...
>
> Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly?
Depends on the definition of "precise". It is more real, but it is not
easier to fly precise. Just a question of training and hardware. Using
pedals and a very good Stick should he
Hi,
O.k. I understand now slowly...
Is the new flightmodel more precise to fly? Still with
some training its too difficult to fly - a precise
landing is a real lucky thing!
Thanx
Greetings
HHS
--- Maik Justus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi Heiko
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are yo
Hi Heiko
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you sure?
>
> If I'm flying, the fuselage rotate in the same
> direction like the rotor. I have to push the right
> virtuel pedal in the Bo 105, but in the real world it
> has to be the left.
>
> If I'm not doing anything, the fuslage is turning with
> r
Hi,
Are you sure?
If I'm flying, the fuselage rotate in the same
direction like the rotor. I have to push the right
virtuel pedal in the Bo 105, but in the real world it
has to be the left.
If I'm not doing anything, the fuslage is turning with
rotor - that it shoulden't be!
Greetings
HHS
Hi
* Heiko Schulz -- Thursday 10 August 2006 18:28:
> The rotor on the Bo 105 is rotating anti-clockwise -
> so the fuselage has to rotate clockwise. Right?
Yes. And that's what it does. Just comment out the tail rotor
in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/bo105/bo105.xml and see.
> But why is the Bo 105 rotating
Hi,
I have a question, maybe a very stupid one:
The rotor on the Bo 105 is rotating anti-clockwise -
so the fuselage has to rotate clockwise. Right?
But why is the Bo 105 rotating in the same direction
the rotor is rotating?
A bug? Or is there anything which I didn't understand?
Greetings
HHS
Hi,
Very few aircraft may use it. Some of them, at least early version of
A-10 can have FM Homing, ILS, TACAN set on 3 separate devices, while two
other radio sets are used for communication.
While not so useful, I tryied to model it as described, using nav 0 to 2.
Unfortunatly deflection needl
Firstly, thank you devs for this awesome piece of software.
I want to help making a joystick binding gui (like fgjs with graphics
of rudder, ailerons, etc)
What do you think?
All feedback appreciated
Thanx
Douglas Campos
> What are sensible mach/alt pairs to use? I am assuming that sea level
> and approach speed are one, and cruising speed and altitude are another.
> What else? Do I even need to define more than one?
>
> Josh
You might try looking in a textbook or in an aircraft technical report (see
the reports l
> What are sensible mach/alt pairs to use? I am assuming that sea level
> and approach speed are one, and cruising speed and altitude are another.
> What else? Do I even need to define more than one?
You should be fine with one alt/mach pair. I did not find any significant
differences in the coeff
10 matches
Mail list logo
