Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)?

2008-09-28 Thread Heiko Schulz
--- Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sa, 27.9.2008: Von: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)? An: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: Samstag, 27. September 2008, 20:08 * Heiko

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)?

2008-09-28 Thread Tim Moore
Heiko Schulz wrote: --- Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Sa, 27.9.2008: Von: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)? An: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: Samstag, 27. September

Re: [Flightgear-devel] mingw fixes

2008-09-28 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Csaba, I commited a modified version of your patch. Csaba Halász a écrit : Hi! Here are some fixes for the mingw platform that I had to make for a successful build. Note, in 2 places I have changed a #include windows.h to a #include Winsock2.h, but that should be ok. For safety,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)?

2008-09-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 28 September 2008: The change wasn't/isn't even necessary (see above). Another reason for the patch was that we could use OSG's model embedded particles in the same scenery. Now that we have XML configured OSG particles, this reason is obsolete, too. No reasons left,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Screenshots of the coming helicopter Eurocopter EC 145

2008-09-28 Thread Robert Black
Matthias Boerner wrote: Hello, I would like to announce some screenshots of the coming helicopter Eurocopter EC 145. http://fgfs.i-net.hu/modules/xcgal/thumbnails.php?album=44 Nice details. Robert - This SF.Net email

Re: [Flightgear-devel] mingw fixes

2008-09-28 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Csaba Halász a écrit : On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Csaba, I commited a modified version of your patch. Csaba Halász a écrit : Hi! Here are some fixes for the mingw platform that I had to make for a successful build. Note, in 2

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an acciden tly way to landinglights; -)?

2008-09-28 Thread gerard robin
On dimanche 28 septembre 2008, Vivian Meazza wrote: gerard robin wrote On dimanche 28 septembre 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 28 September 2008: The change wasn't/isn't even necessary (see above). Another reason for the patch was that we could use OSG's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] mingw fixes

2008-09-28 Thread Csaba Halász
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Csaba Halász a écrit : Thanks Fred! FWIW, my cygwin does not seem to define WIN32 macro. line 226 of configure.ac defines it -Fred Right, I missed that.Thought it was a compiler built-in. Thanks again for fixing

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug or Feature? Or an accidently way to landinglights; -)?

2008-09-28 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, I haven't noticed anything critical missing from the XML particles, and they do put the particles in the right frame of reference, and they do get the right wind, which the osg solution does not. Here with win32 builds by Fred, I noticed that xml-particles linked to the aircrafts are

[Flightgear-devel] Materials wrong for San Diego bay?

2008-09-28 Thread Alex Perry
I haven't investigated why and I thought I'd ask whether anybody knows the answer offhand before following up with the underlying data. The entrance to San Diego bay (between North Island airport KNZY and Lindbergh field KSAN) isn't water; it has trees all over it. Is this just a consequence of

[Flightgear-devel] Correction for the f16's VRP

2008-09-28 Thread Stefan Seifert
Hi, attached is a little patch for the f16. It's VRP is obviously wrong, when watching turns on the ground from outside. I did standard slipping-of-the-edge tests and found an x-value of -180in to improve the situation a lot. Regards, Nine ? Aircraft/f16/initfile.xml Index:

[Flightgear-devel] renderer.cxx: UPDATE_VISITOR_IN_VIEWER

2008-09-28 Thread James Turner
(mostly for Tim) Chasing other problems, came across this in renderer.cxx, accompanied by: // XXX Make this go away when OSG 2.2 is released. #if (FG_OSG_VERSION = 21004) #define UPDATE_VISITOR_IN_VIEWER 1 #endif Would I be right in thinking this can die, since we're two major OSG releases

Re: [Flightgear-devel] renderer.cxx: UPDATE_VISITOR_IN_VIEWER

2008-09-28 Thread Tim Moore
James Turner wrote: (mostly for Tim) Chasing other problems, came across this in renderer.cxx, accompanied by: // XXX Make this go away when OSG 2.2 is released. #if (FG_OSG_VERSION = 21004) #define UPDATE_VISITOR_IN_VIEWER 1 #endif Would I be right in thinking this can die, since