> > However, if a situation
> > arises in which the aircraft models are to be sold for a profit,
> > please contact us to discuss implementation of a Trademark License
> > Agreement for the sale of consumer products.
>
> ..no F-g way, they add a restriction beyond the GPL,
> toss out all Boeing mo
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:21:50 -0600, Jon wrote in message
<003501c97c27$6d008850$470198...@net>:
> > We may go on to keep our model and our code protected under GPL
> > license.
> >
> > Only an information regarding the copyright for such private Name:
> > Boeing..Lockheed.. and so on could be n
Why agonize over this, where obviously no one on this list is expert.
Instead, why not write to h...@softwarefreedom.org or
connect to #sflc on irc.freenode.net and ask the lawyers who offer
the needed advice for free. See:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/services/ (Software Freedom Law Center)
> We may go on to keep our model and our code protected under GPL
> license.
>
> Only an information regarding the copyright for such private Name:
> Boeing..Lockheed.. and so on could be necessary.
>
> These addons won't be a restriction only an information.
>
> Cheers
To be absolutely clea
Hi Maik,
Maik Justus wrote:
> the effect you are discussing is not the Doppler effect, but just the
>
Yes, I know it's not a function of the Doppler itself, but I was
thinking more along the lines of the volume drop off, if it were better,
might help the convincingness of the Doppler, if you
Martin Spott wrote:
> Tim Moore wrote:
>> Martin Spott wrote:
>>> Erik Hofman wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Boeing314
In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11895
Modified Files:
Boeing314A.xml
Log Message:
Add the license
Maybe I'm being naive here , but wouldn't be easier to jusr remove the word
"Boeing" from the files ?
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-s
Hi James,
the effect you are discussing is not the Doppler effect, but just the
volume as a function of the distance. Every aircraft has its own sound
definition including the distance, where the volume is halved
() and the distance where the volume is cutted off
(). The volume as a function o
> .My interpretation of that is.
We must clearly acknowledge and protect their right to their trade
marks. "Boeing" is the registered trade mark of..
Beyond that, in the only case of another company's IP that I have had to
deal with, having had a 'sort of' go-ahead I sent them back a
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:06:42 +0100, gerard wrote in message
<200901211406.42997.ghma...@gmail.com>:
> On mercredi 21 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> > [...]
> >
> > > Modified Files:
> > > Boeing314A.xml
> > > Log Message:
> > > Add the lice
Tim Moore wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > Erik Hofman wrote:
> >> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Boeing314
> >> In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11895
> >>
> >> Modified Files:
> >> Boeing314A.xml
> >> Log Message:
> >> Add the license statement
> >>
> >> +
Martin Spott wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
>> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Boeing314
>> In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11895
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> Boeing314A.xml
>> Log Message:
>> Add the license statement
>>
>> + This simulation model is not
On mercredi 21 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Boeing314
> > In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11895
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > Boeing314A.xml
> > Log Message:
> > Add the license statement
> >
> > +
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Boeing314
> In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11895
>
> Modified Files:
> Boeing314A.xml
> Log Message:
> Add the license statement
>
> + This simulation model is not endorsed by the manufacturer.
gerard robin wrote:
> These addons won't be a restriction only an information.
True.
Erik
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadth
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
>> Neither the name of (any of) the authors nor the names of (any of) the
>> manufacturers may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
>> this file.
>
> Maybe it should be made clear that this part is not an ad
On mercredi 21 janvier 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > Ah sorry, that slipped my attention, you are right.
> > I'll ask Jon about it.
> >
> > Erik
>
> We should discuss this, then, because the impacts may be more far reaching.
> I asked the Boeing licensing people some time ago about our flight mode
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> Neither the name of (any of) the authors nor the names of (any of) the
> manufacturers may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
> this file.
Maybe it should be made clear that this part is not an addition
to the license -- not some
I came up with the following for the F-16 file:
This model was created using data that is, or has been, publically
available by means of technical reports, textbooks, image graphs or
published code. This aircraft description file is in no way related
to the manufacturer of the real aircra
> Ah sorry, that slipped my attention, you are right.
> I'll ask Jon about it.
>
> Erik
We should discuss this, then, because the impacts may be more far reaching.
I asked the Boeing licensing people some time ago about our flight models.
They were OK with us creating models, but were not OK wi
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowMoney
"Does the GPL allow me to sell copies of the program for money?
Yes, the GPL allows everyone to do this. The right to sell copies
is part of the definition of free software. Except in one special
situation, there is no limit on what pr
On Wednesday, 21. January 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> b) The GPL states that "You may charge a fee for the physical act of
> transferring a copy, [...]", but "You may not copy, modify, sublicense,
> or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this
> License".
>
> Now, how would yo
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> I was told by a layer, since we are writing that the model is copyrighted
> protected under Licence GPLV2 , we may write anything we want as addons
> regarding the protection, these addons won't be taken in account , and one
> may ignore it.
That
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> > +
> > + GPL (General Public License)
> > + http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> > +
> > +
> > + [...]This model
> > + is not to be sold.
> > +
>
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> [...]
>> Modified Files:
>> Boeing314A.xml
>> Log Message:
>> Add the license statement
>
>> +
>> + GPL (General Public License)
>> + http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
>> +
>> +
On mercredi 21 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
> [...]
>
> > Modified Files:
> > Boeing314A.xml
> > Log Message:
> > Add the license statement
> >
> > +
> > + GPL (General Public License)
> > + http://www.gnu.org/lic
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 21 January 2009:
[...]
> Modified Files:
> Boeing314A.xml
> Log Message:
> Add the license statement
> +
> + GPL (General Public License)
> + http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
> +
> +
> + [...]This mode
The doppler effect (which I currently have working through the
USE_SOFTWARE_DOPPLER define) has never sounded very "real" to my ear.
Recently I've wondered if it might be to do with the "volume dropoff"
not being enough.
It's hard to subjectively quantify the dropoff in the flyby, but for
exa
> That would be one way to do it. I'm trying to come up with a better
> solution. The problem is that then there may be properties that are
> referenced which are not defined and you'd get unexpected behavior.
>
> Jon
Another possible solution would be to create a C310x configuration that is
not
> Synchronizing FlightGear and JSBSim is already difficult enough without
> the need to search each file for these kinds of things. Would it be an
> idea to ignore these tags when running within FlightGear instead?
>
> Erik
That would be one way to do it. I'm trying to come up with a better
solut
Hi Jon,
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> The C310 is one of the aircraft that - in the JSBSim cvs repository - is
> used for extensive testing of JSBSim operation. There is a need for an
> autopilot for the aircraft to be able to fly out the tests. The autopilot
> file is expected to be found in the same di
31 matches
Mail list logo
