Ncolas,
I didn't want to comment on your first post, everyone has a bad day
sometimes, but here I like to add my 2 ct anyway.
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 17:52 -0500 schrieb Nicolas Quijano:
> In the interest of clarity, moving to OSG was a good, if not brilliant
> move (some potential sources o
In the interest of clarity, moving to OSG was a good, if not brilliant move
(some potential sources of revenue would have it as a requirement as far as
open source engines are concerned)
It's simply a bit bloated, by default, although I suspect you don't have to
ship the parts you don't use at runt
Howdy all, took my sweet time answering, and will not discuss this further
on the list.
I didn't want to start such a conversation, and consequently only answering
now, at the risk of seeing another polemic start : not answering could give
the wrong impression :)
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:40 PM,
Geoff McLane wrote:
> 1. Is CVS TG being fully abandoned?
It depends on whom you ask :-)
In fact, patch submissions against TerraGear CVS not getting processed
for about 10 months finally led to the creation of the 'terragear-cs'
GIT repository. Thus, CVS is nowadays approx. 2 years behind in
de
The TerraGear page -
http://www.terragear.org/cvs.html
shows a link for 'Interactive CVS log browsing' as -
http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/?root=TerraGear-0.0
But this is wrong.
Through guess work I think it should be -
http://cvs.terragear.org/viewvc/?root=TerraGear
Likewi
5 matches
Mail list logo
