Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/SimGear Git -> OSX Gold Dart

[James Turner]

On 6 May 2010, at 21:11, HB-GRAL wrote:

> A day I will never forget on OSX.
> 
> Short version:
> 1. git clone SimGear, make
> 2. installing new ALUT.framework
> 3. git clone FlightGear, make
> 4. Start FlightGear
> 
> Everything works. (Almost).

Fantastisch!

Do I want to ask what the 'almost' is? :)

> Thanks a lot to everyone who made this mission possible.


Thanks for testing, and understanding that in software development, things take 
a few days/attempts to become better.

James


--

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question about *LUT/*lut.h OSX

[HB-GRAL]

James Turner schrieb:
> 
> As always, testing and feedback are appreciated - I will update the Mac build 
> instructions on the Wiki to reflect this new scheme 'soon', unless someone 
> finds a problem with it.
> 

Yes, I have thrown away my own freealut because it produce a buffer 
problem with Sound Effects. I replaced it with your framework and all 
works fine. So the only feedback at the moment is:

Thank you very much!

- Y.

--

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/SimGear Git -> OSX Gold Dart

[HB-GRAL]

A day I will never forget on OSX.

Short version:
1. git clone SimGear, make
2. installing new ALUT.framework
3. git clone FlightGear, make
4. Start FlightGear

Everything works. (Almost).

Thanks a lot to everyone who made this mission possible.

- Yves

--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question about *LUT/*lut.h OSX

[James Turner]

On 6 May 2010, at 15:13, HB-GRAL wrote:

>> I did not have any problems compiling and installing freealut 1.1.0 on 
>> OSX 10.5.8/intel. Sorry my question again but did you change "something" 
>> in freealut source so I need now your framework instead of (still) 
>> avaiable freealut sources?
>> 
>> -Y
> 
> Sorry again, this question is obsolet. You did the not avaiable 
> framework. Ok. -Y

Just to update the situation: I have now updated the configure scripts to deal 
with OpenAL / ALUT 'better' on the Mac. If you put the ALUT.framework in a 
default location, such as /Library/Frameworks, configure will find it 
automatically; if you put it somewhere else, configure (for both SimGear and 
FlightGear) accepts --with-alut-framework-/path/to/dir.

(note thats the directory *containing* ALUT.framework, not the .framework dir 
itself)

Hope that's all clear. It sounds as if you have some local modifications to use 
freeAlut yourself, which of course should work fine too - although the Mac 
portions of configure.ac have always assumed OpenAL and ALUT would be packaged 
as a framework, I think.

Also note that these changes are in git on Gitorious, since CVS is still 
off-line: http://gitorious.org/fg

As always, testing and feedback are appreciated - I will update the Mac build 
instructions on the Wiki to reflect this new scheme 'soon', unless someone 
finds a problem with it.

Regards,
James


--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] William Earnest

[Curtis Olson]

I just wanted to send out one more update on Bill's status.  His recovery
from surgery is progressing nicely, he might get to take a shower today, and
he might get to go home tomorrow or Saturday.  His wife again thanks
everyone for their thoughts and prayers.

(I know that Bill isn't the only person in our FlightGear community to get
sick or have a big emergency or difficult situation in their lives, but I
often don't hear about them.  We want to respect everyone's privacy of
course, but one of the nice things about a community is that we can come
together and support each other when times are tough, even if it might be a
little non-personal when we send out messages via email.)

So I'm very glad and relieved to hear that Bill is doing better, and I hope
all the rest of you all are in good shape too.

Thanks!

Curt.


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Curtis Olson wrote:

> I don't have a lot of details, but Bills wife sent out a quick email this
> morning to say that he has made it through OR and is now recovering.  She
> sent a quick summary of their day yesterday:
>
> Summary of events on May 3, 2010 from 5:30 am to midnight: Chest pain -> ER
> -> cardiac cath -> OR -> Open Heart Unit (OHU) at Lehigh Valley Hospital,
> Cedar Crest and I-78.
>
> She thanks everyone for their thoughts and prayers.
>
> Curt.
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Ron Jensen  wrote:
>
>> On Monday 03 May 2010 12:26:04 Curtis Olson wrote:
>> > I just got an email from Bill Earnest's wife that he is in the operating
>> > room right now undergoing heart surgery after having some chest pains.
>>  I
>> > met Bill and his wife one time when they were here in Minneapolis.  He
>> is a
>> > pilot and and all around good guy.  One of the things Bill does is take
>> > care of spam issues on our mailing list.  There is a very good reason
>> why
>> > you may be thinking to yourself that you've never seen a spam issue on
>> our
>> > mailing lists.  Send Bill a thank you some time. :-)
>> >
>> > I just wanted to send out a quick email here so you all can keep him in
>> > your prayers and thoughts while he has to go through this.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Curt.
>>
>> My thoughts and prayers go out to Bill in his time of need.
>> Best wishes for a speedy recovery,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
>> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
>



-- 
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question about *LUT/*lut.h OSX

[HB-GRAL]

HB-GRAL schrieb:
> James Turner schrieb:
>> Yes, probably - we're trying to get away from the situation where each Mac 
>> developer needs to come up with their own solution to this problem. The code 
>> in the framework I mentioned should be exactly the same code as your 
>> freealut 1.1.0, just packaged as a framework.
>>
> 
> I did not have any problems compiling and installing freealut 1.1.0 on 
> OSX 10.5.8/intel. Sorry my question again but did you change "something" 
> in freealut source so I need now your framework instead of (still) 
> avaiable freealut sources?
> 
> -Y

Sorry again, this question is obsolet. You did the not avaiable 
framework. Ok. -Y

--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Question about *LUT/*lut.h OSX

[HB-GRAL]

James Turner schrieb:
> Yes, probably - we're trying to get away from the situation where each Mac 
> developer needs to come up with their own solution to this problem. The code 
> in the framework I mentioned should be exactly the same code as your freealut 
> 1.1.0, just packaged as a framework.
> 

I did not have any problems compiling and installing freealut 1.1.0 on 
OSX 10.5.8/intel. Sorry my question again but did you change "something" 
in freealut source so I need now your framework instead of (still) 
avaiable freealut sources?

-Y

--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SimGear CVS

[Nathanael Rebsch]

> I just made up a cool sounding name off the top of my head. :-)  If I
> can't git cvs.flightgear.org  up and running
> easily in the next day or so, it might be time to git serious about
> moving to git hosted on a bigger better faster server.

i would love to see the project finally use only a single type of 
revision controll for the same source!
personally i'd say that alone is a big step forward, esp. regarding 
project management.
even if the cvs server did come back up again, i'd still want to 
emphasise that the git repository would be a better solution for the 
project.

regardles of the version controll system in place though, it'd be better 
you used one repository, rather than this current situation on mix and 
match and merging back.

that's just to count as an encouragement ;-)

greetings
Nathanael Rebsch

--
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel