Re: [Flightgear-devel] New airport textures

2011-01-21 Thread Ryan M
Martin's correct. I made cosmetic changes to the textures themselves, nothing outside of that like the way the mapping is done. However, I do agree with John that perhaps some of the runway texturing needs modifications. I tried to modify the grass and dirt runways to integrate more seamlessly w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New airport textures

2011-01-21 Thread J. Holden
Part of the texture problem is with the current data format we are using - there are a number of airports where the texture is incorrect, especially the threshold textures - but we currently only have four options for runways. Also, some countries use yellow textures for some airports - see (fro

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft

2011-01-21 Thread James Turner
On 21 Jan 2011, at 16:46, Hal V. Engel wrote: > With this setup only the p51d stuff comes from $fg-aircraft and all other > aircraft and shared files are pulled from $fg-root. This allows me to keep > everything in sync with the GIT fgdata main line in $fg-root so that I don't > have to worr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FLightProScam

2011-01-21 Thread Vivian Meazza
Heiko wrote > > > > Of course, there is nothing illegal about this - and only a > > bit immoral. > > > > Vivian > > I'm not sure about. Some time ago I downloaded it as well, and I think > Durk did the same. We found out that it is broken, so it can't be > compiled. > > With this it would be ill

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..shifty sunshine camouflage bug in FG-2.0.0-2, has it been fixed in git or FG-2.2?

2011-01-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:12:32 +0100, Arnt wrote in message <20110114021232.6bd1c06f@celsius.local>: > Hi, > > ..just upgraded from Debian Sid's FG-1.9.1 to FG-2.0.0-2, > framerates stayed up ok @ ~ 12-15 fps. These screenshots: > https://github.com/gasguru/flightgearthings/raw/master/fgfs-screen

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FLightProScam

2011-01-21 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, > > Of course, there is nothing illegal about this - and only a > bit immoral. > > Vivian I'm not sure about. Some time ago I downloaded it as well, and I think Durk did the same. We found out that it is broken, so it can't be compiled. With this it would be illegal.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft

2011-01-21 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Friday, January 21, 2011 05:25:27 am Alan Teeder wrote: > -- > From: "Frederic Bouvier" > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:52 AM > To: "FlightGear developers discussions" > > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft > > > Yes, th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FLightProScam

2011-01-21 Thread Vivian Meazza
Gene wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Erik Hofman wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 18:57 -0500, r...@aol.com wrote: > >> http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?p=667522#post667522 > >> > >> Thought you'd find this interesting > > > > Sure, the guy you quoted it only posts scam rela

Re: [Flightgear-devel] --fg-aircraft and multiplayer..aircraft not found?

2011-01-21 Thread Jacob Burbach
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:56 AM, James Turner wrote: > Actually the search has *always* been recursive - for years, by the look of > it. I use the same (refactored) code to support all aircraft dirs, both the > default one in fg-data, and the additional ones. Obviously I didn't want to > break

[Flightgear-devel] ..disk space needed for FG-git , was: reflect mapping

2011-01-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:40:32 +0100, Arnt wrote in message <20110118204032.158726e2@celsius.local>: > how much disk space do I need now? > arnt@celsius:~/FG-git$ du -sch * 6.5MAtlas 508Kcompilation_log.txt 8.0KdebCreator-2.0.0.tar.gz 8.0KdebCreator.tar.gz 32K download_and_co

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Head-UP: FGrun translations

2011-01-21 Thread Frederic Bouvier
> Is it 2011&UTF8 now? BTW, I don't know what 2011 relates to, except the current year ;-) -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://www.youtube.com/user/fgfred64 Videos -- Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Internet domain name & keyword

2011-01-21 Thread Alan Teeder
-- From: "Gene Buckle" Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:10 PM To: "FlightGear developers discussions" Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Internet domain name & keyword > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Curtis Olson wrote: > >> See attached email below ...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Head-UP: FGrun translations

2011-01-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:19:37 +0100 (CET), Frederic wrote in message <32132876.1461071295615977643.javamail.r...@spooler4-g27.priv.proxad.net>: > - "Vadym Kukhtin" a écrit : > > > > > It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use > the latin alphabet. > > > > > Is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Internet domain name & keyword

2011-01-21 Thread Gene Buckle
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Curtis Olson wrote: > See attached email below ... > > I never know how to read these sorts of messages. It could be spam trying > to get us to register our domain with them so they make more money. Or it > could be a legitimate courtesy email. I don't think I want to perso

[Flightgear-devel] Fwd: Internet domain name & keyword

2011-01-21 Thread Curtis Olson
See attached email below ... I never know how to read these sorts of messages. It could be spam trying to get us to register our domain with them so they make more money. Or it could be a legitimate courtesy email. I don't think I want to personally be responsible for registering flightear . b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft

2011-01-21 Thread Alan Teeder
-- From: "Frederic Bouvier" Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 11:52 AM To: "FlightGear developers discussions" Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft > Yes, that's true. For a reason I don't know, I missed that one. > For the moment

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Head-UP: FGrun translations

2011-01-21 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Vadym Kukhtin" a écrit : > It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use the latin alphabet. > > Is it 2011&UTF8 now? Not yet. I am migrating slowly to fltk 1.3 that has utf8, but no release :( That's why the latin alphabet is mandatory for the moment -Fred

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Head-UP: FGrun translations

2011-01-21 Thread Vadym Kukhtin
2011/1/21 Frederic Bouvier > It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use the > latin alphabet. > Is it 2011&UTF8 now? -- --- WBR, Vadym. -- Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft

2011-01-21 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Yes, that's true. For a reason I don't know, I missed that one. For the moment, fg-aircraft is not used in the aircraft chooser. -Fred - "Alan Teeder" a écrit : > Fgrun however does not seem to see any aircraft that are only in > the --fg-aircraft path. -- Frédéric Bouvier http://www.youtu

[Flightgear-devel] FGrun and --fg-aircraft

2011-01-21 Thread Alan Teeder
I have the following set up :- (Windows, current git) --fg-root=C:/FlightGear/data --fg-scenery=C:/FlightGear/Scenery;C:/FlightGear/terrasync --fg-aircraft=C:/FlightGear/Aircraft Fgrun however does not seem to see any aircraft that are only in the --fg-aircraft path. Here is the start o

[Flightgear-devel] Head-UP: FGrun translations

2011-01-21 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi All, the next FG release is imminent now. It is time to check if the FGrun translation for your language is OK and complete. Pay attention to overlapping or truncated text as well as untranslated sentence. It is also possible to submit new translations if your language use the latin alphabet

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New airport textures

2011-01-21 Thread Martin Spott
John Denker wrote: > If you want to have a serious discussion, [...] I think he doesn't want to have a big discussion, he's just offering textures which are making a visual difference compared to the ones which are currently being used in FlightGear. Aside from wether I like these particular cha

Re: [Flightgear-devel] --fg-aircraft and multiplayer..aircraft not found?

2011-01-21 Thread James Turner
On 20 Jan 2011, at 23:47, Jacob Burbach wrote: > Ok, that does raise another question then. In order for the 'wrong' > method to work in any fashion, means you have to be recursively > searching the path given by --fg-aircraft...right? Seems odd, and > certainly serves to create ambiguity and con