Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Mittwoch, den 16.03.2011, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Ryan M: It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the devel-list. (Certainly not me!) Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery developers have either left or are inactive. I'm also

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread thorsten . i . renk
It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the devel-list. vs. Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery developers have either left or are inactive. What a nice example of perceptional relativism! We have the same set of data (= the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT strangeness

2011-03-17 Thread Luuk Paulussen
When you use git rebase, it tries to replay your local commits on top of the new commits in the master branch. If you have multiple commits to the same files locally that have also been committed upstream, you will be trying to replay old changes on top of new ones. A better solution when you

[Flightgear-devel] Using native OSG 3D models - is it possible?

2011-03-17 Thread Hal V. Engel
On the forum there was a thread about an ebook on using Blender to create aircraft models. The web site for the ebook included a number of models and one of these was a WWII USAAF pilot that is very nicely done. The creator of these models has given permission to use these models in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, well, I have to explain: It seems more and more that people prefer using the forum instead the devel-list. vs. Forum activity is winding down too- all the informal aircraft/scenery developers have either left or are inactive. What a nice example of perceptional

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Martin Spott
Heiko Schulz wrote: If the weather is fine, yep, the real pilots here like Detlef, Syd and others spent their time getting some more hours of flight, [...] or are busy with preparations for buying an aircraft - a Cessna 17*5*, in our case Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Quiet

2011-03-17 Thread Ryan M
Now it seems to me it has changed. The list is quiet since a while now; there are only few announcements for code changes, (in the past we had more, though the number of changes are still similar), and as I can see more and more people using the forum for questions about developement and

[Flightgear-devel] Thrust reversal for YASim turboprops?

2011-03-17 Thread Ryan M
I'm trying to implement thrust reversal (if possible) for the ATR 72, a YASim turboprop, but I can't seem to find a way to do so. I've tried the same parameters used for jets: control-input axis=/controls/engines/engine[0]/reverser control=REVERSE_THRUST / control-output control=REVERSE_THRUST

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Thrust reversal for YASim turboprops?

2011-03-17 Thread Gary Neely
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Ryan M tpbspamm...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to implement thrust reversal (if possible) for the ATR 72, a YASim turboprop, but I can't seem to find a way to do so. I've tried the same parameters used for jets: control-input

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Thrust reversal for YASim turboprops?

2011-03-17 Thread syd adams
Hi. That reverse thrust patch never was applied, so Ive used 'thrusters' on my local Beech B200 and C90 (now on my broken down hard drive ) to simulate reverse.I think the turbine engine only responds to the condition property , its the propeller code that needed some work ...from what i vaguely