On 3 Jun 2011, at 22:58, HB-GRAL wrote:
> I see that FlightGear-next-mac fails since some days because of some
> missing plib headers. Is next-mac not followed anymore on hudson, is
> FlightGear-mac-cmake reference now ?
The problem is I switched to the MacPorts PLIB, because it was easier, bu
On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:45:26 AM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> > Hi Stuart and all,
> >
> > > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status
> >
> > We have some (too few!) aircraft providing documentation / tutorials,
> > i.e. how to sta
Hi Hudson
I see that FlightGear-next-mac fails since some days because of some
missing plib headers. Is next-mac not followed anymore on hudson, is
FlightGear-mac-cmake reference now ?
Cheers, Yves
--
Simplify data bac
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:56 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Hi Stuart and all,
>
> > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status
>
> We have some (too few!) aircraft providing documentation / tutorials,
> i.e. how to start, how to use instruments... I like extremely
> detailed/realistic aircraft
Hi Stuart and all,
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/Formalizing_Aircraft_Status
We have some (too few!) aircraft providing documentation / tutorials,
i.e. how to start, how to use instruments... I like extremely
detailed/realistic aircraft, and I'm not asking everyone to provide
cheating autostar
On Friday 03 June 2011 01:49:30 Gaurav Tendolkar wrote:
> I am modelling an battery powered electric motor MAV.
> In JSBsim the battery does not discharge.
>
> 00178 FGElectric::CalcFuelNeed(void)00179 {00180 return 0;00181 }
>
> now i want to write a code where fuel is the power supplied by batt
Hi Gaurav,
For questions specific to JSBSim code, you might also ask on the jsbsim
mailing list (details at www.jsbsim.org) -- although I'm sure several of the
developers are subscribe to both flightgear and jsbsim devel lists.
One other thought if you want to avoid changing C++ code or you wish
Ryan M wrote:
> * Jetways are disabled by default due to noticeable FPS impacts.
I'm feeling slightly uneasy with the current state because people don't
get any jetways at all if they disable the flag in order to preserve
performance. Personally I'd prefer a solution which keeps static
jetways a
I use Gnome 3 and FlightGear and it works well. I do like the Shell,
and after a while it does grow on you.
The main problem I think is that people logically think that as Gnome
3 is released the Shell is completed, where that is far from the
truth, much of the work is still to be done.
As you po
On 03.06.2011 04:58, Roland Häder wrote:
> I have found more:
> http://pastebin.com/UrE81hNW
Looks like an OSG installation problem. There is always an
"osgPlugins-2.x.y" subdirectory for an OSG 2.x.y installation. I don't
think this could be a general error with OSG 2.8.4.
> 2.8.4 is latest sta
On Friday 03 June 2011 06:10:24 Curtis Olson wrote:
> Looks like the linux desktop folks have stopped chasing windows and are now
> chasing mac? Quote from an online review: gnome 3 gives you any color
> theme you like ... if you like black.
s/linux desktop/Gnome/
There's still KDE and all the
I am modelling an battery powered electric motor MAV.
In JSBsim the battery does not discharge.
00178 FGElectric::CalcFuelNeed(void)00179 {00180 return 0;00181 }
now i want to write a code where fuel is the power supplied by battery.
by knowing the total stored energy we will calculate time to
> I'll see what I can come up with this weekend.
Thanks, much appreciated!
> On another note: I seem to remember you had another request for the
> weather system but I was too busy to remember it. Do you remember what
> that was?
I was toying with the idea to model diffuse high-altitude haze by
> If two users in parallel flying spacecrafts will see the same good then
> there is no problem. But everything on Nasal is on local level, not
> global core level.
At least one of us is confused about how things are structured.
My understanding is that there's nothing in Flightgear which guarant
Le 03/06/2011 06:10, Curtis Olson a écrit :
> Is anyone here running gnome 3 (and you would probably know if you
> were.) :-)
>
> I just loaded up Fedora 15 on a test machine and my first comment was
> "hmmm..." I haven't tried to get FlightGear running. I guess I can't
> imagine why it wouldn't
15 matches
Mail list logo
