I've just placed a patch into the forum fixing the altitudes, providing a
new GUI which makes Local Weather Config obsolete and ports Cb towers also
to the new rendering system. I haven't tested it excessively yesterday,
but most of it was written and tested before my computer died, so it
should
2011/12/15 Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 15:49:22 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
2011/12/14 Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
But, the question is how many cloud drawables do we have? The render Bin
sorting bottleneck - if we run into this - is O(log(n)*n) with the n=
number depth
Hello,
A small announce to let you know a new scenery webtool is out:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/submission/shared/
The goal of this tool is to ease the insertion of shared models
position within the FG scenery database for both the submitters and the
scenery maintainer(s). Hope this
Thorsten,
... snip ...
9) Water shader (very impressive!!!) doesn't react to wind/overcast in
Local Weather. Vivian, Emilian - at some point we discussed an interface
of how to pass the situation to the shader. Technically it's really easy
for me to write in any form you like - just tell me
Just a quick note from my end:
While Olivier mentioned only myself as a reviewer of Scenemodels
commits, I consider this new system not only as an aid to reduce the
overall workload for reviewers/committers but also as a tool which
later allows to un-tie the process of submitting object positions
Hi all
Is someone modelling/implementing Arresting Devices for runways ?
Cheers, Yves
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.
But none more important than the
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables for runways do already exist in FG: see them in action at LFRJ
Naval Base for instance.
Olivier
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many
Am 15.12.11 18:26, schrieb Olivier:
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables for runways do already exist in FG: see them in action at
LFRJ Naval Base for instance.
Olivier
Errm, Is this BAK12/14 or MA1A, ES or E28/B ? ;-)
Cheers, Yves
HB-GRAL
-Original Message-
From: [mailto:flightg...@sablonier.ch]
Sent: 15 December 2011 17:37
To: Olivier; FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Arresting Type Devices
Am 15.12.11 18:26, schrieb Olivier:
Hello Yves,
Arresting cables for
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because some
people here are incapable to comprehend
Am 15.12.11 20:39, schrieb Martin Spott:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because
Martin
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the record, the original BAK-12 was provided by David Culp:
http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=918
We're having two models of a BAK-12 in the Base Package because some
people here are
HB-GRAL wrote:
And close to my nose I see here some mystic FAA data output:
[...]
Is this something that could/should come to the scenery database somehow ?
Generally I'd say: Great ! but I'd feel best if I knew that these
positions really match the touchdown areas of 'our' runways. How
-Original Message-
From: Martin Spott [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net]
Sent: 15 December 2011 19:39
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re : Arresting Type Devices
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ones I did in fgdata are BAK12.
Just for the
Am 15.12.11 22:37, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
And close to my nose I see here some mystic FAA data output:
[...]
Is this something that could/should come to the scenery database somehow ?
Generally I'd say: Great ! but I'd feel best if I knew that these
positions really
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The other one, which used to be non-op, seems to have gained operational
capability along the way.
You see, in order to avoid confusion, having just one operational
arrestor would have been the clever solution.
We're trying to simulate real-world, don't we ? Sure, we're
HB-GRAL wrote:
The coordinates comes from column base/reciprocal ends of runways,
is your definition supposed to be identical to runway centerline
at threshold ?
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Am 15.12.11 23:21, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
The coordinates comes from column base/reciprocal ends of runways,
is your definition supposed to be identical to runway centerline
at threshold ?
Cheers,
Martin.
It is Latitude/Longitude of physical runway
Am 15.12.11 23:49, schrieb HB-GRAL:
EDF 06BAK12 61.248633 -149.844258333 AVN 08.11.03
EDF 16BAK12 61.262069 -149.793475 AVN 08.11.03
BIG 19BAK12 64.0077345 -145.707352861 AVN 02/16/2007
EIL 14BAK12 64.684208 -147.117919444
19 matches
Mail list logo