[Flightgear-devel] 2.6.0 for Mac - call for detail bug info & known issues

2012-02-19 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Dear Mac users / developers First, I've heard some users complaining "2.6 for Mac doesn't work," in facebook, or via email without detail info. Could you help me collect what is the cause of this issue? I want to know the following things for reproducing the problem: - Mac model and OS version

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git question

2012-02-19 Thread Ron Jensen
On Sunday 19 February 2012 15:28:05 Scott wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:40 -0700, dave perry wrote: > > On 02/19/2012 02:06 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > > > Am 19.02.2012 21:54, schrieb dave perry: > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> I have been gone for almost a year. I want to start new source trees

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 Release(d)

2012-02-19 Thread Gijs de Rooy
> Gijs wrote: > as many sites/magazins as you can think of :-) Like this: http://www.dutchfs.com/ ;-) More screenshots are available in the (growing) gallery: http://www.flightgear.org/about/gallery-v2-6/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 Release(d)

2012-02-19 Thread Gijs de Rooy
> Stuart wrote: > > On a related note, is there a plan in place for announcing 2.6.0 to > the wider flight simulator community? Just send the announcement (Curt will put it online when the major issues with Mac packages are fixed, which they currently are AFAIK) to as many sites/magazins as yo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 Release(d)

2012-02-19 Thread Martin Spott
Stuart Buchanan wrote: > On a related note, is there a plan in place for announcing 2.6.0 to > the wider flight simulator community? I'll take care of updating Freecode alias Freshmeat, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 Release(d)

2012-02-19 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > just in case you havn't yet noticed yet: our release 2.6.0 is out! > This is our second scheduled release following our published > http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_plan and we did it in time. Fantastic work everyone! Has the official rel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git question

2012-02-19 Thread Scott
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 14:40 -0700, dave perry wrote: > On 02/19/2012 02:06 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > > Am 19.02.2012 21:54, schrieb dave perry: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have been gone for almost a year. I want to start new source trees > >> for simgear and flightgear and track on going developme

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git question

2012-02-19 Thread dave perry
On 02/19/2012 02:06 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Am 19.02.2012 21:54, schrieb dave perry: >> Hi All, >> >> I have been gone for almost a year. I want to start new source trees >> for simgear and flightgear and track on going development. Which git >> branches should I "check out" in this new set o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git question

2012-02-19 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Am 19.02.2012 21:54, schrieb dave perry: > Hi All, > > I have been gone for almost a year. I want to start new source trees > for simgear and flightgear and track on going development. Which git > branches should I "check out" in this new set of directories? And from > the e-mails I have read fr

[Flightgear-devel] git question

2012-02-19 Thread dave perry
Hi All, I have been gone for almost a year. I want to start new source trees for simgear and flightgear and track on going development. Which git branches should I "check out" in this new set of directories? And from the e-mails I have read from the developers list, is appears that fgdata s

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 Release(d)

2012-02-19 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Hi everybody, just in case you havn't yet noticed yet: our release 2.6.0 is out! This is our second scheduled release following our published http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_plan and we did it in time. Thanks everybody for your support, for your contributions and for your patience during this

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hang Glider AirwaveXtreme maintenance

2012-02-19 Thread Martin Spott
D-NXKT wrote: > Please let me know if you are interested in this work and to whom I could > send > this files (1.2MB). A merge request on Gitorious would be preferred (which requires setting up a personal clone), but in case of doubt I'd load this into GIT for you. Cheers, Martin. --

[Flightgear-devel] Hang Glider AirwaveXtreme maintenance

2012-02-19 Thread D-NXKT
Hello, the exclusive hang-glider in fg, AirwaveXtreme150, is in a poor condition. After the switch from plib to osg the model becomes "invisible". I am afraid that this hang-glider is going to die in the future. This would be a pity because the fdm is very special, unique AND quite realistic! T

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-19 Thread Gijs de Rooy
> Tat wrote: > Maybe we should ask some windows users if it works properly (and if > preferences.xml is modified) Browser (Firefox is my default) opens fine here, with the plain preferences.xml from Git. Gijs ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-19 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi Yves, Though I haven't check the source code deeply, fgfs doesn't seem handling --browser-app command-line option properly. According to the code, its default value for OS X is set to "open, " and command-line option seems to be set properly. So I guess the property node ("/sim/startup/brows

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 for Mac OS X.

2012-02-19 Thread HB-GRAL
Hi Tat I downloaded 10.6/7 version and it works fine. Just one small thing I noted (because I am on this myself at the moment for FGx): GUI->Help (opens in Browser) doesn’t open anything here. But maybe this is not OSX only? Cheers, Yves Am 19.02.12 08:55, schrieb Tatsuhiro Nishioka: > Hi, >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] LaTex doc files not in source?

2012-02-19 Thread HB-GRAL
Am 19.02.12 12:59, schrieb Martin Spott: > Hi Yves, > > HB-GRAL wrote: > >> Is the .tex source file(s) as base for the getstart.pdf in our source >> somewhere? > > Yup, LaTeX sources are in the "getstart" repository - and have been > there most of the time: > >http://www.gitorious.org/fg/getsta

Re: [Flightgear-devel] LaTex doc files not in source?

2012-02-19 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Yves, HB-GRAL wrote: > Is the .tex source file(s) as base for the getstart.pdf in our source > somewhere? Yup, LaTeX sources are in the "getstart" repository - and have been there most of the time: http://www.gitorious.org/fg/getstart/ Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly

[Flightgear-devel] LaTex doc files not in source?

2012-02-19 Thread HB-GRAL
Hi Docs Is the .tex source file(s) as base for the getstart.pdf in our source somewhere? Could not find it in fgdata/Docs, only the map.tex. Beside the online help I am trying to create a new (user) helpbrowser for the FGx launcher and need the .tex file. Thanks a lot, Yves --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Models not (or badly) rendered

2012-02-19 Thread Durk Talsma
On 19 Feb 2012, at 10:05, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=673 > Ah, I thought that that was a different bug: I.e. a specifc error in the model path of one of our more recent commits. But, yeah the original committer does mention that no traffic

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Models not (or badly) rendered

2012-02-19 Thread Gijs de Rooy
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=673 > From: durkt...@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:50:43 +0100 > To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] AI Models not (or badly) rendered > > Hi Guys, > > I just discovered that some bad has happe

[Flightgear-devel] AI Models not (or badly) rendered

2012-02-19 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Guys, I just discovered that some bad has happened to the AI models rendering code: No AI model is rendered anymore, except the MD11 (which technically isn't an AI model, but just a reused version of the regular Aircraft version. This is with yesterday's FlightGear/SimGear/fgdata, git check