[Flightgear-devel] Cocoa/SDK10.5 support, small merge request

2012-07-08 Thread HB-GRAL
Hi

I sent a small merge request here to flightgear next:
https://www.gitorious.org/fg/flightgear/merge_requests/36

This small addition makes it possible flightgear still compiles with 
older osx development tools (cocoa/sdk10.5). I checked this change also 
with newer SDKs and it will/should not affect any other setting.

Maybe James has to check and merge it in, or comment the request.

Thanks a lot, Cheers, Yves


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] scenery licence for 2.8 and later

2012-07-08 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:41:26 +0200, HB-GRAL wrote in message 
4ff777a6.5070...@sablonier.ch:

 Am 05.07.12 18:04, schrieb Curtis Olson:
 
 
 
  We !!!STRONGLY!!! encourage authors to use the GPL so that we can
  incorporate their work into the overall project and distribute the
  work
 
 http://git.fgx.ch/flightgear/commit/?h=nextid=b14ddd40110e271efcd1416e9bf15d48d99c3123

..this, is a _clarification_. ;o)
diff --git a/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
b/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec index 6feac43..7c03fc1 100644
--- a/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
+++ b/package/RedHat/flightgear.spec
@@ -6,17 +6,17 @@ Summary: The FlightGear Flight Simulator
 Name: %{name}
 Version: %{version}
 Release: %{release}
-License: GPL
+License: GPL-2.0

..this clarification is easier to handle in courts than the popular
GPLv2-and-later, because it sets _one_ set of rules, rather than
2-or-more sets of rules.

..the one big advantage of GPLv2(.0) over GPLv3, is it allows 
the FG, busybox and Linux kernel code owners to e.g. deny Ubuntu
distribution of FG, busybox and Linux kernel code until Ubuntu 
stops supporting Microsoft's no-Linux-on-UEFI-boot-machines scheme.

..in fact, the GPLv2 walks away on violations, and the ban on
distribution, then comes from copyright law, and remains in place,
until _all_ copyright owners agrees to offer the violator, a 
_new_ license to distribute, e.g. FG code under the GPLv2.

..if some stubborn grumpy old principled coder fails to respond 
with a yes to the violators pleas of mercy, then the violator 
must remove that stubborn grumpy old principled coder's code 
from e.g. FG, and distribute only what the violator has been 
allowed to distribute.  Ditto for 2, 3 etc grumpies, who may set 
their own personal conditions as they damned well please, e.g. 
Peace on Earth, UEFI boot specs for all OS'es, Islamic interest 
rates on mortgages, hot kinky women, or FG on the GPLv3. ;o)


..so, all we need, is e.g. an Ubuntu violation of each of FG, 
busybox, Linux kernel, or any other GPLv2 copyright violation,
tip off the owners, so they can take it to the cops, and, report 
it, properly, as _software_piracy_, which is _exactly_ what 
GPLv2 violations, are.  Cops and courts must be told so, so 
they can do the right things about it.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel