Re: [Flightgear-devel] Kinect for pc for head tracking?

2013-03-18 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On 17/03/13 20:27, geneb wrote: > On Sun, 17 Mar 2013, Alasdair Campbell wrote: > >>> To which end, you are not very encouraging with your ridiculous >>> proclivity to commence every sentence with a double period, which >>> does little other than highlight you as a bloody fool. >>> >>> Alasdair Cam

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenRTI / HLA

2013-03-18 Thread Pat
if you put the library files outside of x86_64-linux-gnu and x86_32-linux-gnu you would not be able to tell if the files are for 32 or 64 bit. That directory is part of the multi-arch specification. I don't think we want to take it out. Can this be fixed in the CMakeLists.txt? Is that the right s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenRTI / HLA

2013-03-18 Thread Pat
I ran a clean build of master/next using download_and_compile.sh -ei and everything under fgfs/flightgear built including fgviewer. Smoke test: Run with C172P at KSFO, takeoff for a run to half moon bay. Multiplayer working. So what needs testing with HLA? -Pat On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:30:47 +010

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Kinect for pc for head tracking?

2013-03-18 Thread Renk Thorsten
>>> After all, >>> head tracking is one of the most important aspect of flight sim. >> It's fine that people are interested in something, but could we please >> tone down the rhetorics and refrain from arguments 'I am interested in X, >> hence it must be one of the most important aspects of f