>
> If we are going to slip the release, we should only do so once :)
>
> -Stuart
>
One reschedule is a good idea. Would an indefinite delay, with a
promise republishing the schedule by a given date be appropriate or
desirable?
For example
"Due to constraints on our developers' available ti
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Permission granted ;-)
>
> As everybody seems to be caught in some real life trouble, I can't see a
> better way to get the release out than delaying it for a while.
>
> Would two weeks be enough for everybody? That will get us to the weekend
Permission granted ;-)
As everybody seems to be caught in some real life trouble, I can't see a
better way to get the release out than delaying it for a while.
Would two weeks be enough for everybody? That will get us to the weekend
Aug, 31/Sep 1.
Torsten
Am 13.08.2013 16:56, schrieb Curti
We would need permission from Torsten D, our release manager, but I would
also second Thorsten R's proposal to defer the 2.12 release by a week or
two. I have been spread very thin this summer with my day job projects and
will be out of town myself on the 16-18 of August.
I think we should at min
On 13 Aug 2013, at 12:58, Renk Thorsten wrote:
> On the risk of making myself really unpopular, but would now be a good time
> to defer the release? It seems James is caught in the middle of moving,
> Stuart indicated some other private things piling up, I have the maddest
> travelling schedu
On the risk of making myself really unpopular, but would now be a good time to
defer the release? It seems James is caught in the middle of moving, Stuart
indicated some other private things piling up, I have the maddest travelling
schedule I've ever had in my life this fall, and I haven't seen
6 matches
Mail list logo