Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
On 13 Aug 2013, at 21:42, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote: I propose pushing out the release by a month. I've got a bit more time available for FG right now, but not as much as I did 12 months ago, and it sounds like James and Thorsten R are similarly time limited. I think it will take longer than usual to address any issues found in the RCs. If we are going to slip the release, we should only do so once :) +1 on all counts. James -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
I propose pushing out the release by a month. I've got a bit more time available for FG right now, but not as much as I did 12 months ago, and it sounds like James and Thorsten R are similarly time limited. I think it will take longer than usual to address any issues found in the RCs. If we are going to slip the release, we should only do so once :) Agreed - in case there are any problems in my department, I won't be able to react till Sep. 7th - I've two trips scheduled between now and then. * Thorsten -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Some Help
Hi Ante, On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Ante Cugura wrote: I have recently downloaded FlightGear, and am enjoying it, but I seem not be able to download some aircraft. Even when the program says I have downloaded the aircraft correctly, when I go to use the aircraft, it comes up with a small blue and yellow plane. Also, with the plane which do successfully download, I am not able to get it in the livery which I want, even when it says that I can get it on your website. I use a MacBook Air laptop, and it would be greatly appreciated if you were able to provide some help. How are you running the simulator? From the command line or from a launcher? if you are running from the command-line, can you post your command-line here? Unfortunately I don't run a Mac myself, so I may not be able to provide very specific help on this. You might want to post to the FlightGear forums (http://www.flightgear.org/forums/) where there may be more people who can help. -Stuart -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Updated 707
Hi All, Marc Kraus (CC'd as he's not on the -devel list) has produced a (very) significant update to the 707, a model that Innis Cunningham developed a number of years back. It's available from http://gitorious.org/boeing/707 and is well worth a look, particularly for the fine cockpit and engineer station with extensive start-up tutorial. Marc has asked if it would be OK to replace the existing 707 with this new one. Innis (if you're around) - are you OK with this? If Innis is not around, does anyone have any problems with adding this? If replying - please Reply-All to include Marc in this discussion, Thanks, -Stuart -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
Hi Pat, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Pat wrote: One reschedule is a good idea. Would an indefinite delay, with a promise republishing the schedule by a given date be appropriate or desirable? An indefinite delay would risk the release never being completed, and we'd be back where we were before with big gaps between releases. A defined delay gives us all something to aim for :) Plus we want to get this release completed so we can start on the Christmas release, tentatively named 3.0.0. -Stuart -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.12 is branched
I think the main initial hurdle here is to get the Mac Windows releases sorted out on Jenkins (if they aren't already). We've done the code freeze and branch on schedule so we are mostly down to the mechanics and time of actually building and pushing the release out the door. Thanks, Curt. On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pat, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Pat wrote: One reschedule is a good idea. Would an indefinite delay, with a promise republishing the schedule by a given date be appropriate or desirable? An indefinite delay would risk the release never being completed, and we'd be back where we were before with big gaps between releases. A defined delay gives us all something to aim for :) Plus we want to get this release completed so we can start on the Christmas release, tentatively named 3.0.0. -Stuart -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Curtis Olson: http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.edu/~uav/ http://www.flightgear.org - http://gallinazo.flightgear.org -- Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with 2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
