Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Wait for the tide to come in.
Jon
I presume this is to do with the fact that the sea is modelled as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Bytheway wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Wait for the tide to come in.
Jon
I
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying2.jpg
On Thu 17 May 2007 12:40, George Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Martin.
P.S.: Just a joke
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On 5/17/07, gh.robin wrote:
On Thu 17 May 2007 12:40, George Patterson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
Martin Spott wrote:
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Wait for the tide to come in.
Jon
-
This
Hello,
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
Here snapshots
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying2.jpg
http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying3.jpg
Regards
--
GĂ©rard
8 matches
Mail list logo