Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Martin Spott wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: Hi, the page: http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 says: Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release. I don't think this holds true ;-) I'm open to suggestions for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-13 Thread Nathanael Rebsch
On 10/13/2010 10:59 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote: Martin Spott wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: Hi, the page: http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 says: Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release. I don't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Nathanael Rebsch On 10/13/2010 10:59 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote: Martin Spott wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: Hi, the page: http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 says: Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-13 Thread Mally
:11 AM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description On 13 Oct 2010, at 09:58, Martin Spott wrote: Well, in case of doubt I'd probably just ask those people, who decided that it's been worth incrementing the major release number for this very relase - they should

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-11 Thread Curtis Olson
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Martin Spott wrote: Hi, the page: http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 says: Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release. I don't think this holds true ;-) I'm open to suggestions for more appropriate verbiage. :-) Regards, Curt. --

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear v2.0.0 short description

2010-10-09 Thread Martin Spott
Hi, the page: http://www.flightgear.org/announce.html#v2.0.0 says: Version 2.0.0 [...] is primarily a bug fix release. I don't think this holds true ;-) Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !