Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting 3d Model formats (was Trains?)

2007-02-01 Thread Vadym Kukhtin
2007/2/1, Curtis Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It also occured to me that you could just about automate this process entirely ... and create your own paper 3d models from nicely done low-poly count models. Some years ago I'm often use Pepakura - it is exactly that you said. i.e. *.3ds = paper

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting 3d Model formats (was Trains?)

2007-02-01 Thread Josh Babcock
Curtis Olson wrote: It also occured to me that you could just about automate this process entirely ... and create your own paper 3d models from nicely done low-poly count models. I don't know, I thought it was really cool and I thoroughly enjoyed putting the model together, but I often

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting 3d Model formats (was Trains?)

2007-02-01 Thread leee
On Friday 02 February 2007 00:51, Josh Babcock wrote: Curtis Olson wrote: It also occured to me that you could just about automate this process entirely ... and create your own paper 3d models from nicely done low-poly count models. I don't know, I thought it was really cool and I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting 3d Model formats (was Trains?)

2007-01-31 Thread Curtis Olson
On 1/31/07, leee wrote: The RS3D format isn't included on the OSG website but I wouldn't expect it to be as doesn't just include surface type objects but also mathematical ones such as analytical solids. For example, think of a simple cylinder. As an analytical solid it is just defined by

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting 3d Model formats (was Trains?)

2007-01-31 Thread leee
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 23:45, Curtis Olson wrote: On 1/31/07, leee wrote: The RS3D format isn't included on the OSG website but I wouldn't expect it to be as doesn't just include surface type objects but also mathematical ones such as analytical solids. For example, think of a