Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pilot models

2006-03-24 Thread Jim Wilson
> -Original Message- > From: "David Megginson" > > flies them), but when I do use external views, I find it very > disconcerting if nobody's flying the plane, especially the small ones > like the Cub. I like it: http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/p51pilot.jpg Best, Jim -- Jim Wilson Kel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pilot models

2006-03-24 Thread Josh Babcock
Josh Babcock wrote: > > I think it would be a good thing if aircraft designers started including > select animations tied to /sim/model/pilot-visible-internal and > /sim/model/pilot-visible-external with the appropriate conditions so > that they each work in the appropriate views > (/sim/current-

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pilot models

2006-03-24 Thread Josh Babcock
David Megginson wrote: > On 24/03/06, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a >>bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain >>why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Pilot models

2006-03-24 Thread David Megginson
On 24/03/06, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a > bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain > why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is an argument for > having model

[Flightgear-devel] Pilot models

2006-03-24 Thread James Turner
Possibly this is just me, but: I find adding pilot models to the aircraft a bit weird - could it be made optional (a submodel)? I can't quite explain why, it just seems disconcerting to me. Of course there is an argument for having models for each crew member and passenger, to accurately reflect lo