Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > Yet, we have such information out of YAsim, from AI ? (like said Csaba ) > fgfs --aircraft=WhichFly --carrier=WichFloat --parkpos=cat1 > FG place the WhichFly at the right place on the cat Yes, but that's something else -- that's defined in th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread gerard robin
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > > It is the best way, to have in property the coordinates of the points > > which are defined in the AI model (may be, the precision would a > > problem) > > The properties are the smaller problem, whe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > It is the best way, to have in property the coordinates of the points which > are defined in the AI model (may be, the precision would a problem) The properties are the smaller problem, whether they are inserted via Nasal or automatically. The vect

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread gerard robin
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Csaba Halász -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > > Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes, > > maybe we can just add them to the property tree there? > > But it does so as an OSG node visitor with intersection testing > done b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread gerard robin
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > > The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must > > be calculated for each carrier or any AI object according to the > > .xml file definition , one calculation for Nimitz one for Foch o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > One could certainly get the values out, but that would be a > lot more work. Oh, and the manual way has the advantage that you can easily add arbitrary stuff, such as other (non-cat) vertex offsets, or offsets for places where no vertex is anywhere

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Csaba Halász -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes, > maybe we can just add them to the property tree there? But it does so as an OSG node visitor with intersection testing done by OSG, or something. One could certainly get the values ou

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 22, 2007 8:55 PM, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And even if: noting down offsets is something that we as modelers > do all the time anyway, as we need it in animations. Well, the FGAICarrier code already finds catapult and wire nodes, maybe we can just add them to the proper

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must > be calculated for each carrier or any AI object [...] Ah, you want to avoid the calculation per object. Frankly, I don't think that's such a generic problem. Most carrier capable aircra

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > The problem here is we don't have a generic solution this must > be calculated for each carrier or any AI object according to the > .xml file definition , one calculation for Nimitz one for Foch one > for ... and so on. That's not the problem.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread gerard robin
On sam 22 décembre 2007, Csaba Halász wrote: > On Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year) > > > > I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the > > position of the aircra

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 22 December 2007: > I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the > position of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an > AI object in my case the catapult and the wires on the carrier. > Is their any way (nasal ??) to get it out of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread Csaba Halász
On Dec 22, 2007 7:46 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year) > > I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the position > of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an AI objec

[Flightgear-devel] Position of the Aircraft versus position of some points from an AI objects

2007-12-22 Thread gerard robin
Hello, Probably a stupid question (i promise will be the last of the year) I would like to know (to calculate) the diff of position between the position of the aircraft and the position of a specific point on an AI object in my case the catapult and the wires on the carrier. Is their any