Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-21 Thread Jari Häkkinen
> I agree, we are due for an aggressive -Wall clean up and I'd like to remind > our active developers that they should consider always compiling with > warning flags activated. The following is pretty standard for me ... > > CFLAGS="-Wall -O2" CXXFLAGS="-Wall -O2" ./configure > > There is a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-20 Thread Alan Teeder
Torsten Thanks - the CVS fix has arrived already. Alan -Original Message- From: Alan Teeder [mailto:ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk] Sent: 20 August 2009 16:05 To: 'FlightGear developers discussions' Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation? Torsten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-20 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> Except line 88 of RenderTexture.cpp is not complete for the non GNUC case. > (sorry) Oups - fixed! > > VC++ 2008 is still giving a few warnings for other source files, but > nowhere near as many as before. Well - VC++ ist not (yet) installed here, so I can't help with that. Torsten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-20 Thread Alan Teeder
August 2009 14:27 To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation? > I agree, we are due for an aggressive -Wall clean up and I'd like to remind > our active developers that they should consider always compiling with >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-20 Thread Curtis Olson
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote: > > I agree, we are due for an aggressive -Wall clean up and I'd like to > remind > > our active developers that they should consider always compiling with > > warning flags activated. The following is pretty standard for me ... > > > > C

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-20 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> I agree, we are due for an aggressive -Wall clean up and I'd like to remind > our active developers that they should consider always compiling with > warning flags activated. The following is pretty standard for me ... > > CFLAGS="-Wall -O2" CXXFLAGS="-Wall -O2" ./configure > > There is a lo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-19 Thread Curtis Olson
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Reagan Thomas wrote: > Torsten Dreyer wrote: > >> Is that correct? > >> > > Certainly not! Fixed in CVS, thanks for reporting. > > > > Torsten > > > > > -- > > Let Crystal Reports handle th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-19 Thread Reagan Thomas
Torsten Dreyer wrote: >> Is that correct? >> > Certainly not! Fixed in CVS, thanks for reporting. > > Torsten > > -- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-19 Thread Torsten Dreyer
> Is that correct? Certainly not! Fixed in CVS, thanks for reporting. Torsten -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment

[Flightgear-devel] Potential issue with magnetic variation?

2009-08-18 Thread Tom P
Hi While building fgfs from CVS on Windows, I've noticed the following warning. 1>c:\flightgear\flightgear\src\network\native_ctrls.cxx(439) : warning C4800: 'double' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false' (performance warning) It's telling that the magnetic variation gets truncated to a boo