Hi Lee,
Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 15:57 +0100 schrieb leee:
> While YASim is a very good fdm, imo (and I've done a few in my time), it
> isn't
> suited to accurately portraying a glider because the 'cruise' definitions
> don't apply. The cruise section assumes level flight and needs to know t
While YASim is a very good fdm, imo (and I've done a few in my time), it isn't
suited to accurately portraying a glider because the 'cruise' definitions
don't apply. The cruise section assumes level flight and needs to know the
power required to maintain that level flight for it to work correct
> The time ( and Jon :) ) is (are) working for us , wouldn't the
> coming external forces within JSBSim solve these aerotow and winch starts
> funct (and others.)
>
> Regards
>
> GĂ©rard
Yes, Dave Culp has done a lot of work on this, and I am continuing it, but I
don't have an idea when i
On Mon 2 July 2007 10:10, Martin Spott wrote:
> Detlef Faber wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 00:43 + schrieb Martin Spott:
> > > The in-flight behaviour of the YASim FDM is, similar to that of the
> > > 'Bocian', extremely 'direct' and unforgiving. As an alternative you
> > > might do bet
Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 08:10 + schrieb Martin Spott:
> Detlef Faber wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 00:43 + schrieb Martin Spott:
>
> > > The in-flight behaviour of the YASim FDM is, similar to that of the
> > > 'Bocian', extremely 'direct' and unforgiving. As an alternative you
Hi,
At first thanks for uploading and correcting the
error.
How is the behaviour of a glider in flight?
If YASim is a good fdm, it should simulate the
behaviour with the right data correct.
I see more problems in the simulating of the
enviroment like thermals, turbulences, wind etc
Greeting
Detlef Faber wrote:
> Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 00:43 + schrieb Martin Spott:
> > The in-flight behaviour of the YASim FDM is, similar to that of the
> > 'Bocian', extremely 'direct' and unforgiving. As an alternative you
> > might do better by using a derivative of the JSBsim FDM as used in
Am Montag, den 02.07.2007, 00:43 + schrieb Martin Spott:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
> > The YASim-FDM is lacking - I don't know how to match
> > this to the real perfomance...
>
> The in-flight behaviour of the YASim FDM is, similar to that of the
> 'Bocian', extremely 'direct' an
Hi Heiko,
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> The YASim-FDM is lacking - I don't know how to match
> this to the real perfomance...
The in-flight behaviour of the YASim FDM is, similar to that of the
'Bocian', extremely 'direct' and unforgiving. As an alternative you
might do better by using a derivative of t
On Sun 1 July 2007 20:10, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I finished a first version of an ASK 21 Glider.
> It's a very wellknown glider, over 800s are built.
>
> There are still a lot of things to do: some
> instruments are missing, the pilots are missing and
> there is a some artefacts on the
Hi,
Today I finished a first version of an ASK 21 Glider.
It's a very wellknown glider, over 800s are built.
There are still a lot of things to do: some
instruments are missing, the pilots are missing and
there is a some artefacts on the canopy ( in OSG is
much nicer!).
The YASim-FDM is lacking
11 matches
Mail list logo