gerard robin wrote:
> On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
>> gerard robin wrote:
>> > On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
>> > > gerard robin wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
>> > > been identified properly,
>> >
>> >
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> > > gerard robin wrote:
> > >
> > > I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
> > > been identified properly,
> >
> > i only have eye, a computer, a
Brian Schack wrote:
> Given that we have this weirdness in the Himalayas, my first
> inclination is to check the underlying data. Atlas and FlightGear
> both showed the same problem, so this indicates that the problem is
> not with Atlas or FlightGear, but with the data they use.
FlightGear and
gerard robin wrote:
> On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> > gerard robin wrote:
> > I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
> > been identified properly,
> i only have eye, a computer, and archives
So, did you create screenshots from the 1.0.1 Scenery
Hi Brian,
Brian Schack wrote:
> data (and by the way, much of this is guesswork on my part - if I'm
> labouring under false assumptions, please let me know). Maneuvering
> to an area in question, I checked 'srtm_elevation' and got ... nothing
> at all. There is data there - checking 'v0_lake, f
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > So older data were right.
>
> I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
> been identified properly,
>
> Martin.
i only have eye, a computer, and archives
--
GĂ©rard
http://pagesperso-orang
On mardi 20 janvier 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On samedi 17 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> > Brian Schack wrote:
> > > There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
> > > running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
> > > the wall runs along, a
gerard robin wrote:
> So older data were right.
I wonder how you managed to draw a conclusion even before the error has
been identified properly,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
On samedi 17 janvier 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> Brian Schack wrote:
> > There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
> > running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
> > the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:
>
> The underlying
> "Martin" == Martin Spott writes:
Martin> Brian Schack wrote:
>> There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the
>> Himalayas, both running NS and EW. I'll give the line of
>> latitude or longitude that the wall runs along, and the end
>> coordinates of the walls:
Brian Schack wrote:
> There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
> running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
> the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:
The underlying SRTM elevation data is known to have many voids in the
Hi
Brian Schack wrote:
> There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
> running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
> the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:
Thanks for reporting!
Especially in these mountainous regions I feel a b
There are several huge and very unnatural walls in the Himalayas, both
running NS and EW. I'll give the line of latitude or longitude that
the wall runs along, and the end coordinates of the walls:
(1) e86.250 (NS), from n27.875 to n28.000
The above wall is capped on the north by an east-west
13 matches
Mail list logo