On 10/05/2012 05:53 AM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Andy is still around, but inactive. It might be possible to run stuff by him
once in a while.
He even reads the mailing list (but not the forums) on occasion. :)
Indeed, I'm busy with other things these days, but am still broadly
happy to answer
Am 05.10.2012 12:53, schrieb James Turner:
On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
When you do that code reading (as I do it currently for the engines) it
appears that at least some crucial parts are not such a woodoo and it
appears that adding features to improve the FDM capabilities is
HI,
I just posted on the forum about YASim and I thought it was a good idea
to post here as well:
Talking about us (FG's aircraft modelers and developers) and YASim:
YASim is a very cool tool, I like it very much, but it comes with its
crwod of frustrations you have to live with. And the
On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
When you do that code reading (as I do it currently for the engines) it
appears that at least some crucial parts are not such a woodoo and it
appears that adding features to improve the FDM capabilities is not such
a crazy idea. For that we
On 10/05/2012 12:53 PM, James Turner wrote:
Otherwise I worry, given the nature of the solver, we'll keep
optimising the solver for some aircraft, and making other existing
aircraft worse - until someone tests them, and announced that they're
no longer working. James
Would it be possible to
James wrote,
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:zakal...@mac.com]
Sent: 05 October 2012 11:54
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] YASim and documentation
On 5 Oct 2012, at 11:32, Alexis Bory wrote:
When you do that code reading
6 matches
Mail list logo
