[Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread Jim Wilson
The hud zooms with changes in FOV (zooming the view). Can that be fixed? Best, Jim ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: The hud zooms with changes in FOV (zooming the view). Can that be fixed? No, if the HUD is added to a 3d cockpit of the F-16 this is the behavior one would expect. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim Wilson wrote: The hud zooms with changes in FOV (zooming the view). Can that be fixed? No, if the HUD is added to a 3d cockpit of the F-16 this is the behavior one would expect. Ah yes, didn't think of that. A couple of suggestions: 1).

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: Ah yes, didn't think of that. A couple of suggestions: 1). Default to the 2D HUD unless there's a specific aircraft level configuration parameter made to override it (e.g. for the F16 2D panel). 2). Use the default HUD design in 2D HUD mode. The one that currently comes

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread Jim Wilson
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I see no real solutions for the current code but to leave it like it is right now. You didn't read my message. Most of our aircraft don't have HUDs in real life so it is only there for the convenience of the user. For these aircraft it doesn't have to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Hud bug or feature?

2003-10-16 Thread nhv
At Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:45:29 - , Jim Wilson wrote: Can't we just default to the 2D? The ONE aircraft that needs the 3D could have a configuration parameter to initiate it. We don't have to make major changes now, but we should at least be releasing code that works, even if it is considered