after fighting with my new graphics card:
I do confirm , the actual "CVS release + Mathias Patch" is OK.
I just Wonder about the Carrier Landing Fonction with FDM JSBSim.
Up to the release before it it was possible to patch JSBSim ( patch from
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/car
Martin Spott wrote:
> Fuer mich tut's der - [...]
Sorry, this was intended to be a private EMail. I was just reporting
success on my test-course,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> =46ound a thinko. It worked for my testcases by accident.
> Attached ia a small patch not thought for application to CVS right now.
Fuer mich tut's der - jedenfalls kann ich jetzt lustig zwischen EKOD,
EKSB, EDXF und EDHK mit dem Autopiloten in der A-10 im Viereck fliege
> After a quick testing, (shorter than the compilation time)
> my JSBSim aircraft prototypes are running, flying again.
>
> Mathias has found the cause.
>
> Which is not JSBSim itself.
>
> BUT, Why that "Freezing" version was working for Yasim
> aircrafts ?
Le mardi 31 mai 2005 à 09:01 +0200, Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag 31 Mai 2005 08:05, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Since I have to visit a customer today, I expect to find time tomorrow.
> > Sorry for that ...
> Just before any customer ...
>
> Found a thinko. It worked for my te
Hi,
On Dienstag 31 Mai 2005 08:05, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Since I have to visit a customer today, I expect to find time tomorrow.
> Sorry for that ...
Just before any customer ...
Found a thinko. It worked for my testcases by accident.
Attached ia a small patch not thought for application to
Hi,
Hmm,
I hoped that this is gone now, but it seems to be worse.
I am shure Davids recent patch to JSBSim.cxx in JSBSim's cvs works around that
problem.
I will take an other look at that. May be I have still a thinko in that
'tolerant' point in triangle test.
Since I have to visit a customer
Le lundi 30 mai 2005 à 11:36 -0500, Dave Culp a écrit :
> > > well-loved "no scenery below the aircraft" ground cache message.
> >
> > I don't get it, I didn't see this behavior until after I committed the
> > patches, when I noticed it once. Melchior has these patches also applied
> > and didn't c
Dave Culp wrote:
well-loved "no scenery below the aircraft" ground cache message.
I don't get it, I didn't see this behavior until after I committed the
patches, when I noticed it once. Melchior has these patches also applied
and didn't complain.
Maybe this is something to do with OS, compil
> > well-loved "no scenery below the aircraft" ground cache message.
>
> I don't get it, I didn't see this behavior until after I committed the
> patches, when I noticed it once. Melchior has these patches also applied
> and didn't complain.
Maybe this is something to do with OS, compiler, or vide
Giles Robertson wrote:
See the same thing with CVS at KSFO this morning (but thought it was a local problem).
Higher logging levels produce our well-known and well-loved "no scenery below the
aircraft" ground cache message.
I've just updated and built todays CVS code, discovered a problem.
See the same thing with CVS at KSFO this morning (but thought it was a local
problem). Higher logging levels produce our well-known and well-loved "no
scenery below the aircraft" ground cache message.
Giles Robertson
> I've just updated and built todays CVS code, discovered a problem.
> Start
12 matches
Mail list logo
