On Sunday 26 June 2005 16:36, Gerard Robin wrote:
> > It's the new nasalised electrical system. The turn indicator is hardcoded
> > to expect 60 ampere as input. The new system outputs 28 volts instead (I
> > told Curt that it made more sense to output volts rather than amperes).
> > So the result
Le dimanche 26 juin 2005 à 07:53 +0200, Roy Vegard Ovesen a écrit :
> On Sunday 26 June 2005 04:04, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> > I notice it as well, but I thought my CVS version is outdated, so I didn't
> > mention it.
> >
> > Beside the turn coordinator, everything on the radio stack seems to b
On Sunday 26 June 2005 04:04, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> I notice it as well, but I thought my CVS version is outdated, so I didn't
> mention it.
>
> Beside the turn coordinator, everything on the radio stack seems to be out
> as well.
It's the new nasalised electrical system. The turn indicator
On June 25, 2005 08:20 pm, Gerard Robin wrote:
> Beware instrument failure !
> C172r and others aircraft have a turn coordinator out of order :=(
> seems to be property:
> /instrumentation/turn-indicator/indicated-turn-rate
I notice it as well, but I thought my CVS version is outdated, so I didn'
> Beware instrument failure !
> C172r and others aircraft have a turn coordinator out of order :=(
> seems to be property:
> /instrumentation/turn-indicator/indicated-turn-rate
I noticed that. I wonder when that happened?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel ma
