Jim Wilson wrote:
> Is this still true? I'm running KDE and can't remember the last
> time artsd got in the way. To be honest though, I don't recall what
> changed. Maybe I just turned off most of the stupid sounds in the
> kde apps.
My impression was that recent versions of arts and esd releas
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 28 April 2004 14:15:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Oh, I forgot to mention: the main problems with aRts and ALSA seem
to lie in ALSA, at least for some chips (e.g. AC97). This improved
vastly in the latest 2.6.* Linux kernels.
Sure, the most widely used so
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 28 April 2004 13:46:
- aRts can use ALSA
- KDE can play sound without aRts (AFAIK; haven't tried)
Oh, I forgot to mention: the main problems with aRts and ALSA seem
to lie in ALSA, at least for some chips (e.g. AC97). This improved
vastly in th
Erik Hofman said:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>
> >>ALSA and Arts
>
> > This article leads me to the assumption that OpenAL at least on Linux
> > is situated _always_ on top of the ALSA OSS emulation layer and does
> > not use the ALSA interface directly but I find it hard to believe
> > Why shou
Martin Spott wrote:
ALSA and Arts
This article leads me to the assumption that OpenAL at least on Linux
is situated _always_ on top of the ALSA OSS emulation layer and does
not use the ALSA interface directly but I find it hard to believe
Why should I avoid directly using the ALSA layer with
