Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre3 base patch request
Boris Koenig wrote: Erik, in order to determine how feasible it would be to even further extend tardiff.pl in one way or the other it would be useful to know what _major_ changes to the FlightGear base package are planned, or at least likely to occur within the near future, so things like structural changes but also file format changes (e.g. because of compression) would be interesting. Steven has meanwhile written a pretty advanced version of the original script that for example now provides means to determine if files/folders were moved or renamed within the FlightGear base package tree in order to reduce the resulting patch file's size. There do exist some other ideas, but many of these would be extremely specific and would only make sense in certain cases. So, what kind of likely changes come to your mind ? The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go ... Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre3 base patch request
Sorry for cross-posting, didn't intend to do so, was probably caused because this topic comes originally from the users list. Erik Hofman wrote: Boris Koenig wrote: The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go ... It might be useful if such changes could be documented - at least the more significant ones, do you usually make (detailed) cvs comments for these things ? Even though the structural changes can be easily tracked down by the script already, it might help if the other things would be mentioned somewhere. Updated or new files itself would not currently be a problem, rather changes in file formats (possibly caused by using compression on RGB files) would be more problematical. - Boris ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre3 base patch request
Erik Hofman wrote: The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go ... weird, this seems to be related to the mailing list application (pipermail ?) - I did indeed only send the posting to the devel-list, but it (as well as all replies to it !) shows up on the users-list as well, seems to be mailheader related, because it was a reply to another list ? - Boris ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre3 base patch request
Boris Koenig wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go It might be useful if such changes could be documented - at least the more significant ones, do you usually make (detailed) cvs comments for these things ? Sure, most of the time anyway. http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/data/Aircraft/?cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9 Even though the structural changes can be easily tracked down by the script already, it might help if the other things would be mentioned somewhere. Updated or new files itself would not currently be a problem, rather changes in file formats (possibly caused by using compression on RGB files) would be more problematical. You could check the timestamps of those files. They shouldn't change unless something has changed. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-users] Re: FlightGear-0.9.5-pre3 base patch request
Erik Hofman wrote: Boris Koenig wrote: Erik Hofman wrote: The most likely changes are updated (and new) aircraft 3d model related files. The rest is not very predictable. It comes as things go It might be useful if such changes could be documented - at least the more significant ones, do you usually make (detailed) cvs comments for these things ? Sure, most of the time anyway. http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/data/Aircraft/?cvsroot=FlightGear-0.9 Note that you can always do something like the following command which will show all the changes/log messesages since a particular date: cvs log -d02/25/2003 | less (Notice that this needs to be in form of MM/DD/) Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
