Re: [Flightgear-devel] Crash during startup with OSG version

2007-07-19 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 12:29 -0500, Curtis Olson wrote: For about 2 weeks now I'm getting a FlightGear crash deep in the OSG internals on my laptop. I was hoping it would be a transient issue in OSG and clear itself up, but so far that is not the case. The same code and versions of everything

Re: [Flightgear-devel] BUG(S) with new(?) KSFO scenery in cvs

2007-12-13 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:39 +0100, AnMaster wrote: Also I noted quite a few items out in the water near runway 10L: Some lampposts and some rotating cisterns or something. Further away (37*48 56.5N, -122*18 37.8W is what HUD said for ufo, should the - really be there? Another bug?) there

Re: [Flightgear-devel] missing fsfgdb files in base package?

2007-12-15 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 19:59 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote: But now I am concerned that all these missing light models are now placed incorrectly around the SFO area (or at least are not aligned properly with the terminal building) and I'm also concerned that these lights are not appropriate for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Shader based random trees and improved random objects

2008-01-23 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 22:04 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote: I've been working on a shader-based approach to creating random trees with help from Tim Moore. Here's a screenshot of what I've managed to achieve so far: http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/forest.jpg A patch which includes

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Multiplayer local echo patch

2008-04-26 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 12:45 +0200, Durk Talsma wrote: On Thursday 22 November 2007 07:26, I wrote: Recently, Martin Spott sent me a patch for the multiplayer system, which apparently hasn't been applied yet: http://durktalsma.xs4all.nl/mp_bugfix.diff Originally there was a problem

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch for multiplayermgr.cxx

2008-05-27 Thread Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 23:53 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote: You might not have noticed it yet but currently it is impossible to use a receive port number different from the send one. If a send port is given the same port number is used as receive port too, regardless of any user specified