Re: [Flightgear-users] Frame rates (was Re: Outa the box and outa sight)

2004-10-21 Thread Erik Hofman
Chris Metzler wrote: My framerates are, for the most part, good enough that I've been experimenting with the values in materials.xml, increasing the surface density of ground structures. I was able to double the density of all the urban structures without a significant frame rate hit (but with

[Flightgear-users] radio not working right?

2004-10-21 Thread John Pearson
I set nav1 to 110.3 (for seatac) while using a Cessna 172R (JSBSim 2d panel) (or any other aircraft) and flightgear crashes without telling me why. I can't seem to find any logs it generated either. I'm running the 0.9.6 windows version. I can't change nav1 at all without flightgear

[Flightgear-users] New JSBSim Newsletter Issue

2004-10-21 Thread Jon Berndt
The Fall issue of the JSBSim newsletter, Back of the Envelope is online at the JSBSim web site, www.jsbsim.org. Click on the newsletter link in the sidebar at left, or select one of the newsletters at the top of the main page. The Fall 2004 issue features contributions by Mathias Fröhlich,

Re: [Flightgear-users] Outa the box and outa sight

2004-10-21 Thread David Luff
On 10/21/04 at 9:41 AM Chris Metzler wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:30:22 +0800 Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok here's the comparison.I have two boxes sitting side by side both have Windows 98SE.One is a 850 duron with a GF4MX440 64m with 256meg of main memory running FG 9.5.The

Re: [Flightgear-users] Flyable aircraft

2004-10-21 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On October 21, 2004 04:49 pm, C Sanjayan Rosenmund wrote: Someone mentioned the ability of installing and uninstalling aircraft, and possibly loading them as modules. This brought up (for me) the idea of moving back the starting point when the program loads. Instead of starting in the aircraft