[the [EMAIL PROTECTED] spammer]
* Curtis L. Olson -- Friday 10 December 2004 01:36:
What lists is this happening on.
It was flightgear-users only AFAIK.
Have these replies started up again, or is it only certain lists where
it is happening? I think I accidentally clicked on the link in
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
What lists is this happening on. I did send a note to this user a month
or so ago, and thought the issue was resolved. Have these replies
started up again, or is it only certain lists where it is happening? I
think I accidentally clicked on the link in one of his
Erik Hofman wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
What lists is this happening on. I did send a note to this user a
month or so ago, and thought the issue was resolved. Have these
replies started up again, or is it only certain lists where it is
happening? I think I accidentally clicked on the link
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 10 December 2004 13:15:
Alternatively adding:
denysenders = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message = Your spam filter is braindead
To your acl if you run exim will solve the problem.
Umm ... that will generate yet another bounce reply from White_Wind, no?
Better
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 10 December 2004 13:15:
Alternatively adding:
denysenders = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message = Your spam filter is braindead
To your acl if you run exim will solve the problem.
Umm ... that will generate yet another bounce reply from White_Wind,
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 10 December 2004 13:51:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon Stockill -- Friday 10 December 2004 13:15:
denysenders = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message = Your spam filter is braindead
Umm ... that will generate yet another bounce reply from White_Wind, no?
No -
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
OK, so the only thing I had to do is rent a (mail)server. That's not much
better actually. I guess that 99.999 percent of internet users don't maintain
their own (virtual) server. :-|
I did say *if* you ran exim... If you don't, then obviously you'll need
another method.
On Friday 10 December 2004 09:00, Erik Hofman wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
He/she may have, but have whitelisted the wrong thing. IOW,
he/she may have whitelisted flightgear-users in the From:
header rather than in List-Id: or Reply-To:. The
frustrating thing to me is that, having
On December 10, 2004 07:28 am, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Umm ... that will generate yet another bounce reply from White_Wind, no?
Better send that to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or the flightgear-users list
maintainer. ;-)
m.
That gives me such a good idea. It will be funny to have mail bouncing back
On December 9, 2004 08:13 pm, Jon Stockill wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
Debian unstable on all my systems.
Slackware 10.0 here (as you'd probably guessed by the slackware packages
I keep producing).
Debian unstable here.
___
Flightgear-users mailing
Erik Hofman wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
He/she may have, but have whitelisted the wrong thing. IOW, he/she may
have whitelisted flightgear-users in the From: header rather than in
List-Id: or Reply-To:. The frustrating thing to me is that, having
subscribed, this person can't be
I'm quite sure I did *not* click that link, yet I don't get these
annoying messages any more. Neither does Erik? So, maybe, after your
recent note to him that developers started to complain he
whitelisted everyone listed in the Thanks file?
That doesn't wash; I don't get the mail, and I'm not in
12 matches
Mail list logo
