To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is terribly
incorrect. From N60.50 to N61.00, E11 there is a large strip running
east and west with apparently no elevation data.
I'm not sure if this is reported somwhere
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote:
To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is terribly
incorrect. From N60.50 to N61.00, E11 there is a large strip running
east and west with apparently no elevation
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:55:41 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote:
To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is
terribly
incorrect. From N60.50 to N61.00, E11 there
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:55:41 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote:
To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is
terribly
incorrect. From N60.50 to
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:55:41 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote:
To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is
terribly
Frank Olaf wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:55:41 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote:
To where should I direct concerns about the scenery?
There is quite a large portion of scenery near my home which is
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:48:51 -0600, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frank Olaf wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:55:41 +0100
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 14:35, Frank Olaf wrote: