On Tuesday 15 November 2005 00:24, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Well as far as the fixes go no I think the fixes are valid,see Paul's
comments,
OK, I don't really make use of the fixes so I've not investigated them much
yet.
If that airfield is named correctly then the problem comes
back to FG if
On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:04, Innis Cunningham wrote:
As at a casual glance there seems to be many instances of more than
one waypoint with the same name in the data base
Not just fixes, either - airfields, too. EG73 (Fearn) for example, once
worked fine - but somewhere along the line,
AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:04, Innis Cunningham wrote:
As at a casual glance there seems to be many instances of more than
one waypoint with the same name in the data base
Not just fixes, either - airfields, too. EG73 (Fearn) for example, once
worked fine - but
Not just fixes, either - airfields, too. EG73 (Fearn) for example, once
worked fine - but somewhere along the line, somebody added some tiny strip in
Englandshire and called it (incorrectly, AFAIK) EG73 too. I don't think this
is the only example, either... Must this sort of thing be sorted
On Monday 14 November 2005 13:07, Josh Babcock wrote:
Airport data gets periodically overwritten by Robin's data, so yes.
Plus, it is the polite thing to do. X-Plane users aren't bad people,
just a little misdirected. Heck, I used to be one :) I would drop him an
e-mail pointing out the
AJ MacLeod writes
On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:04, Innis Cunningham wrote:
As at a casual glance there seems to be many instances of more than
one waypoint with the same name in the data base
Not just fixes, either - airfields, too. EG73 (Fearn) for example, once
worked fine - but
On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:22, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Yep and I found two of them in a row RIC08 being one and the other one
escapes me at the moment.
Anyway that is not the problem.The problem is FG choosing to fly to the one
that is 15000 miles away over the one that is 50 miles away.
Vassilii Khachaturov writes
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Yep and I found two of them in a row RIC08 being one and the other one
escapes me at the moment.
Anyway that is not the problem.The problem is FG choosing to fly to the
one
that is 15000 miles away over the one
On Sunday 13 November 2005 06:20, Josh Babcock wrote:
With 26^5 (11881376) possible identifiers You'd think there wouldn't be
any duplicates. Actually, I just checked fix.dat.gz, and it came up with
70011 entries whether I did a sort -u on it or just counted the entries.
This should mean that
