Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-08-04 Thread Sterling Somers
ng From: curtol...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 14:52:20 -0500 To: flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time For one of my projects, I also have an interest in slowing down FlightGear below real time rates (for some possible human factors experiments.) Curr

Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-08-03 Thread Curtis Olson
r and > ACT-R as close as possible to be synchronized. > > Thanks, > > Sterling > > -- > From: brother...@hotmail.com > To: flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:25:06 -0400 > > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users

Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-07-31 Thread Sterling Somers
chly, Sterling Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:34:55 +0100 From: anders-...@gidenstam.org To: flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Sterling Somers wrote: > Does anyone know of a way to slow down time to less-than-real time? I

Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-07-30 Thread Sterling Somers
00 From: anders-...@gidenstam.org To: flightgear-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Sterling Somers wrote: > Does anyone know of a way to slow down time to less-than-real time? I > know warp will allow you to speed-up time, but

Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-02-16 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Sterling Somers wrote: Does anyone know of a way to slow down time to less-than-real time? I know warp will allow you to speed-up time, but it seems it canÿÿt be fractional. IS there another way to do that perhaps? There is no obvious reason for why that should not be pos

Re: [Flightgear-users] Slow Down Time

2012-02-16 Thread Curtis Olson
Right now we only support an integer multiplier of time. However, high on my todo list (once the dust settles on the 2.6 release) is to convert this to a floating point multiplier -- so we could run at 1.5x time for instance. Once that work is done it should be no problem (I hope) to specify a mu