The only feature of a window manager I wanted is the frame and window
decorations and possibly the ability to move some pop-up dialog boxes
with the pointer. I've used Qt Embedded to do a GUI on Linux
framebuffer (not DirectFB) and it offers the option of running your
application as the
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:02 +0100, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
wrote:
The only feature of a window manager I wanted is the frame and window
decorations and possibly the ability to move some pop-up dialog boxes
with the pointer. I've used Qt Embedded to do a GUI on Linux
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 08:57 +0100, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
wrote:
I'd hazard that that would be a lot more work than just picking up
Nikita's work and moving forward.
Cairo is a lot of dependency to pull in for a lightweight GUI...
None of the projects I'm now doing require the
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:38 -0700, Nikita Egorov wrote:
Dont forget that DirectFB is (at the moment, of course)
lowlevel library!
For example :
It has no methods to draw/fill arc and polygons.
I thought I might use Cairo to do those things.
I'd hazard that that would be a lot more work
In fact, the most FLTK's features (except GL) are working properly
with DirectFB. As I wished to put only minimal changes into the
sources of FLTK so I've simply rewritten most of X11's functions used
in FLTK :).
I don't think I understand what you are doing. It seems harder to me to
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:38 -0700, Nikita Egorov wrote:
Dont forget that DirectFB is (at the moment, of course) lowlevel library!
For example :
It has no methods to draw/fill arc and polygons.
I thought I might use Cairo to do those things.
Window managers have no decoration.
I haven't
I thought I might use Cairo to do those things.
Pango?
I couldnt build them for my powerpc embedded device...
Hope not!! I need to study the API of DFB, FLTK and look at the code
you have already written to really make a comment. My needs are user
interfaces for machines so I have no
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 02:17 -0700, alain savelli wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know iof the last version of FLTK support Framebuffer.
About a year and a half ago Nikita Egorov took the first steps in
porting FLTK to DirectFB, I would like to continue that effort and see
if it will
On 29.09.2008, at 11:17, alain savelli wrote:
I would like to know iof the last version of FLTK support Framebuffer.
There is a version of FLTK 1.1 out there that supports framebuffers.
There is no official release yet. 1.4 is a pretty good candidate for
core developer supported
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 02:17 -0700, alain savelli wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know iof the last version of FLTK support Framebuffer.
About a year and a half ago Nikita Egorov took the first steps in
porting FLTK to DirectFB, I would like to continue that effort and see
if it will get
On 29.09.2008, at 21:35, Ormund Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 02:17 -0700, alain savelli wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know iof the last version of FLTK support
Framebuffer.
About a year and a half ago Nikita Egorov took the first steps in
porting FLTK to DirectFB, I would
11 matches
Mail list logo
