Unfortunately there isn't support for this currently. There was an
issuehttp://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/issues/detail?id=81created
for this a while back, but nobody's claimed it yet.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Filip Kinsky fi...@filovo.net wrote:
Maybe I just can't see
, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:42 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Martin,
1. I'd not considered this usage, but it seems sensible. I'll make the
required changes so you can call Mappings multiple times.
2. This is difficult, because while the containers have the same purpose,
they don't
There was a bug in the Not.Nullable code that I've just fixed, could you
confirm (or deny) whether this has had any affect on your problem?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Steven Lyons stevenly...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I'm having a weird problem that hopefully someone might have some
that didn't exist in my Oracle.DataAccess class
On Feb 19, 6:05 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Good link Filip, I didn't know that existed. It's a shame people don't
submit things like that as patches.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filip Kinsky fi...@filovo.net wrote
When was the last time you did an update? There was a bug relating to this
that I fixed about an hour ago.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Tom Warnat war...@mauve.de wrote:
This does not seem to work with MySQL.
The SQL Query is something like this:
Create table foo (
FooID
I just meant to say that it would be great if this tool became part of
NHibernate itself, maybe in the Contrib project.
Could you explain why you think this would be a good thing? I'm interested
because I actually made the opposite decision recently, and would like to
hear opinions for the
Thanks Jimit, I will review and apply these as soon as I get the
opportunity. Time is short right now.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jimit Ndiaye jimitndi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
The attached patch contains the following:
1) Added support for
.
On Feb 19, 9:35 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
There was a bug in the Not.Nullable code that I've just fixed, could
you
confirm (or deny) whether this has had any affect on your problem?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Steven Lyons stevenly...@gmail.com
wrote
Paul, Andy: I've been working on a rather large rewrite of conventions for
trunk, so I've got that one covered. I currently have all the changes in a
local git branch, but I'll try to get it pushed to a public svn one so you
guys can take a look (if you're interested).
Paul, obviously we don't
My decision was very much driven from a project management point of view, so
it's been interesting to hear your perspective as a user; I will bare your
comments in mind next time I come to consider Fluent NHibernate's place in
the big scheme of things.
I've just paid for a year's website hosting
The whole merge into svn is taking too long for a friday night, so I'll do
it tomorrow. You get the general idea though, i'm sure.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:03 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
Paul, Andy: I've been working on a rather large rewrite of conventions for
trunk, so
Conventions svn
branchhttp://code.google.com/p/fluent-nhibernate/source/browse/#svn/branches/conventions,
most stuff is in src/FluentNHibernate/Conventions
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:29 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
The whole merge into svn is taking too long for a friday night
There's not currently a fluent way to do this, but you should be able
to use SetAttribute(type, typeof(MyUserType).AssemblyQualifiedName)
On 2/24/09, pq paul.qu...@terraindigo.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with a legacy Oracle DB with natural keys. A lot of the
are char(10)...I have a
Seen your issue. I'm away from a machine currently though, so I can't
be of any help until tomorrow.
On 2/24/09, aawaijane andrew.awaij...@gmail.com wrote:
I submitted an issue yesterday where fluent is creating both a joined-
subclass and a subclass mapping for child entities of a base
You people certainly output mappings in some weird ways. What's wrong with
just using WriteMappingsTo on the PersistenceModel?
As for the APM, you can call CompileMappings instead of Configure - same
difference just without requiring a Configuration instance.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:19 AM,
I've fixed this and closed the issue, thanks.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:26 PM, James james.freiwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting composite user types to work correctly with
fluent NHibernate. I've submitted a patch which includes a failing
test (but not a fix
I'm only dashing here, so I can't give a proper answer. What you're doing
sounds right, the IsDirty really should be protected internal rather than
just internal; it's internal so it doesn't show up for consumers of the
interface, but that obviously stops inheritors from using it too!
On a side
Did you read the wiki? How is yours any clearer than the Reveal example?
On 3/1/09, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't like any of these but this might work. What do you think?
Map(x=x.GetType().GetProperty(propertyName).Name);
or
Map(x = x.GetType().GetProperties().Single
That should work. Have you tested your config without Fluent?
On 3/1/09, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok I can do it like this
Configuration cfg = LoadDefaultConfiguration();
_sessionFactory = Fluently.Configure
(cfg).BuildSessionFactory();
but how do I add
step,
Boolean completedSynchronously) +75
On Mar 1, 11:31 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
That should work. Have you tested your config without Fluent?
On 3/1/09, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok I can do it like this
Configuration cfg
Attributes aren't really in our game plan. The ForAttribute thing is a nice
shortcut, but it's not really something I want to promote. One of the big
tenets of Fluent NHibernate is that it doesn't pollute your entities with
mapping concerns; as a result, there aren't going to be any prebuilt
sense?
On Mar 1, 12:30 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a little confused as to what you're trying to achieve. Can you
explain
your setup a little better?
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:44 PM, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Here is the full stack
)))
.BuildSessionFactory();
On Mar 1, 1:21 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that makes sense.
Your exception tells me that you haven't added any fluent mappings. You
should just be able to use the code from your first email combined with
the
second.
var cfg
You can pass a Configuration instance into Configure, or you can use
ExposeConfiguration.
On 3/2/09, christianacca christian.crowhu...@btinternet.com wrote:
I am trying to integrate FNH with the Session management functionality
implemented in the uNhAddins project.
It seems like I cannot
, joan };
foreach (var employee in employees)
{
session.SaveOrUpdate(employee);
Console.WriteLine(employee.Id);
}
On Feb 12, 5:56 pm, James Gregory jagregory
,
jack, sue, bill, joan };
foreach (var employee in employees)
{
session.SaveOrUpdate(employee);
Console.WriteLine(employee.Id);
}
On Feb 12, 5:56 pm, James Gregory jagregory
Your best bet is the Wiki, but it's not complete and it certainly doesn't
cover the API in depth (to the level overloads etc...). Your best bet is to
just investigate with Intellisense, it's not all that complicated; failing
that, the unit tests are always a good place to read - we're about 80%
The wiki should really contain something about this, but it doesn't yet. I
wrote a blog post about it a while ago though, so you should be able to get
started from there:
http://blog.jagregory.com/2009/01/05/fluent-nhibernate-subclass-syntax-changes/
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, mhnyborg
There's nothing in FNH to do the actual name conversion, but you could
create an ITypeConvention
implementationhttp://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/AutoMappingTypeConventionswhich
would handle your properties - you'd just need to handle the ids.
public class ColumnNameConvention : ITypeConvention
I'm pretty sure we don't support this with automapping. You'll have to map
these classes with standard fluent mappings.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Matteo Baglini matteo.bagl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I read that Auto Mapping supported table-per-subclass inheritance
strategy.
This is not implemented yet. You can use the SetAttribute method instead.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:52 AM, mhnyborg mhnyb...@gmail.com wrote:
I can not find the Where clause in the fluent mapping.
If it's there can someone show me an example
class name=Equipment where=EquipmentType=1
id
Nope.
It's not possible because we sort all the mappings to make sure it satisfies
NHibernate's order requirements. If we didn't do this, you can create
invalid mappings depending on what order you map things. We'd have to come
up with a more sophisticated algorithm for sorting, but I really don't
, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com
wrote:
There's nothing in FNH to do the actual name conversion, but you could
create an ITypeConvention implementation
http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/AutoMappingTypeConventionswhich
would handle your properties - you'd just need to handle the ids
Hey Kevin,
Just so I understand correctly, it's the key-many-to-one element that should
have a lazy attribute on, but when you use SetAttribute it's being put on
the composite-id element?
If that's the case, then it shouldn't be a big change to get a Lazy property
that works that way. I'll create
works
fine as a workaround but I think should not be necessary if FNH
intends to default lazy to false.
Thank you,
Kevin
On Mar 4, 6:16 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Kevin,
Just so I understand correctly, it's the key-many-to-one element that
should
have a lazy
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:20 AM, James Gregory
jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
I believe lazy is actually true by default. Either way, they Lazy methods
are required because you can override the default in conventions, so
someone
could set it to true (or false) and need the inverse method
There should be an inner exception in the FluentConfigurationException,
what's it say?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Craig van Nieuwkerk crai...@gmail.comwrote:
I am trying to configure fluent nHibernate and have this code
Assembly mappingAssembly =
You'll need to do an override and explicitly set those two relationships to
be many to many's.
Off the top of my head, use the ForTypesThatDeriveFrom method with City, and
call HasManyToMany for both PersonWorks and PersonBirths. You may need to
play around with the parameters, possibly explicitly
No it's not broken, somebody else would've noticed by now and our tests are
pretty comprehensive.
Can you show me the code you're using to A) create your entities, and B)
save your entities. Your mappings look ok.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, aemami aemam...@gmail.com wrote:
Cause it's
You don't normally have the discriminator as an actual property in your
entity too, it's usually just a column. That's not to say it's incorrect,
just something I've not seen before. Perhaps try it without.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Roger Heim roger.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've
() followed by
DiscriminateSubClassesOnColumn(), Fluently.Configure() failes but a
generated hbm.xml file is correct.
I'm sorry I don't know enough about the FNH source to offer a patch.
On Mar 6, 3:44 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
You don't normally have the discriminator
Good catch!
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Jan Van Ryswyck
jan.van.rysw...@gmail.comwrote:
I found the solution to this problem which resulted from my own
stupidity in the first place. It all became clear to me as soon as I
generated the hbm files from the fluent NH mapping.
class
I'm not really familiar with composite keys in a production environment
(nothing outside of writing the code to support it in FNH), could you give
me an example of the actual code you're using to save your entities? Even
more helpful would be if you could reduce your mappings down to the bare
You can't currently do that. It's something we're planning on supporting,
but it isn't done yet.
I'm not in a position to show code right now, but I'm sure you could hack
something together in the meantime using reflection.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Eric Liprandi
There's the PersistenceSpecification which will verify your mappings are
persisted correctly. Most of the time we hook it up to a SQLite DB, but
there's nothing stopping you from using it against another database. Should
work for what you need. Just be warned it doesn't handle complex mappings
:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [
mailto:fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.comfluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
] *On Behalf Of *James Gregory
*Sent:* 10 March 2009 11:24
*To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Testing against existing schema
There's
You need an NHibernate IUserType for Role, then you can specify that with
CustomTypeIsMyUserType() on your Roles property.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Dave Woods d...@solidhouse.com wrote:
I am doing manual mapping classes and I think I am stumped on this
one:
public class user
{
That's the correct way. How much easier do you want?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Mike Chaliy m...@chaliy.name wrote:
Hi all,
I have custom IUserType - UriUserType, how to configure AutoMapping to
use this type for all Uri properties?
At this time I am using custom implementation of
That's a bug. You'll need to modify the offending area of code in the FNH
codebase yourself, or wait until one of us has time to fix it.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Sergio Costa oscil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I posted an issue on the project site about Fluent Nhibernate
generating
(_customType);
}
}
}
On 11 Бер, 12:07, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
That's the correct way. How much easier do you want?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Mike Chaliy m...@chaliy.name wrote:
Hi all,
I have custom IUserType - UriUserType, how
I don't think you should be mapping Name in the SuperClassTypeMap as well as
in the subclasses.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Martin Nilsson mffmar...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm trying to map the state pattern to NH as this page tells me to do:
I going about this the
wrong way maybe?
I have worked around it using an intermediary object which works but is a
bit clunky :)
James Gregory wrote:
You need an NHibernate IUserType for Role, then you can specify that with
CustomTypeIsMyUserType() on your Roles property.
On Mon, Mar 9
on a HasMany(). Am I going about this the
wrong way maybe?
I have worked around it using an intermediary object which works but is a
bit clunky :)
James Gregory wrote:
You need an NHibernate IUserType for Role, then you can specify that with
CustomTypeIsMyUserType() on your Roles property
:12 AM, sianabanana sianm...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Any ideas james,
I have tested deleting updating and selecting, and this works.
I just cant insert a record - as it tries to update.
On Mar 8, 12:48 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not really familiar
Do you know how to do this with regular NHibernate? If you don't, it's best
you ask the question at the nhibernate users mailing list. Once you know
that, we'll know how to implement the behavior for Fluent.
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Tom Warnat
@Erik: That's interesting, I've not seen that approach before.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:49 PM, BringerOD bringe...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you end up getting this to work?
On Mar 9, 10:13 am, Dave Woods d...@solidhouse.com wrote:
I am doing manual mapping classes and I think I am stumped on
' conventions work
will change when we move to the semantic model, but our users will be
isolated from this.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:32 AM, James james.freiwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds excellent.
On Mar 4, 8:10 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
This email is a heads up
branch...
:)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 AM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
...and it's committed! *Hides from the angry mob of devs with broken
builds*
The wiki has been updated with the new syntax, as well as with some
dedicated pages to conventions.
- Conventions http
It's still there, you just access it through WithSetup instead of
WithConvention now.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Martin
martin.hornag...@marstangroup.comwrote:
Hi James (or anyone else),
I am probably being daft, but what is the best way to deal with base
types using the new
I'm not sure what you mean, are you using automapping?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Adriano Machado adriano.mach...@gmail.com
wrote:
James,
Regarding inheritance and subclasses, how do I define the convention
for the primary key of the subclasses?
On Mar 11, 8:22 pm, James Gregory
? It’s nothing to stress about,
I’m just curious. Maybe I can switch to all InnoDB tables, or in my dreams
to MS SQL 2008.
*From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto:
fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *James Gregory
*Sent:* Mittwoch, 11. März 2009 16:51
*To:* fluent
Great!
FYI, if you've got more than one convention you can use AddFromAssemblyOf
instead of just Add to add them all.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:33 PM, ComradeF comra...@gmail.com wrote:
With the release of r394, this is fixed! Hooray.
Here's how I accomplished the task at hand:
Have you got a working design using hbm.xml? If so then I can use that to
debug FNH, if not, then I don't know if it's a problem with your particular
setup or FNH in general.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Craig van Nieuwkerk crai...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks. It seems to be a pretty basic
, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you got a working design using hbm.xml? If so then I can use that to
debug FNH, if not, then I don't know if it's a problem with your
particular
setup or FNH in general.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Craig van Nieuwkerk crai...@gmail.com
As far as I'm aware components don't have IDs. Please clarify what you want
to do.
http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/#components
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
How do we map composite Id on components with fluent Nhibernate? Is it
possible?
WithSetup is for configuring the conventions that the automapper uses to
discover the properties on your entities. If your property is Id but your
column is TableNameId, then that is not what you want.
http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/AutoMappingConventions
That page on the wiki shows pretty
mapping was not valid.
The TestAutoMapPropertySetFindPrimaryKeyConvention() unit test was the
thing I was looking for.
Now I've to override conventions for my FK naming convention.
On Mar 13, 5:22 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
WithSetup is for configuring the conventions
Try:
UseCompositeId() .WithKeyProperty(xxx)
.WithKeyProperty(yyy);
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is what I meant.
http://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#components-compositeid
On Mar 13, 9:45 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote
...@gmail.com
wrote:
Isn't the case just to apply the IOneToOneConventions to the inherited
mappings (both Discriminated and joined subclasses)?
On Mar 12, 4:45 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I see your problem. You can have multiple column names for the key
Martin: Your issue should now be fixed, nearly everything now exposes an
EntityType property.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:00 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
I was talking about primary keys, the foreign keys obviously have to be
generated.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM
Fields aren't supported currently, easiest fix is to make it a private
autoproperty.
private IListAccountType accountType { get; set; }
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:29 PM, epitka exptrade2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi, I am trying to map private field IListAccountType _accountType
like this
)
.SetAttribute(class,
ClientAccountTypeCompositeID);
but it throws
{The method or operation is not implemented.}
On Mar 13, 1:20 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Try:
UseCompositeId() .WithKeyProperty(xxx)
.WithKeyProperty(yyy);
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM
where i was about to look next.
I will do this and then update.
Thanks again for the support so far,
On Mar 11, 3:48 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if you're not able to write tests, then another way would be to
get
the behavior you desire to work
is in the class attribute?
composite-id name=CompId class=FooCompositeID
key-property name=MedicareNumber/
key-property name=Dependent/
/composite-id
On Mar 13, 5:09 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry but that's not supported. We support composite-ids
You can't currently. Either use hbm.xml or traditional sql.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Rub ruboard@gmail.com wrote:
What about support auxiliary database objects?
This official nhibernate documentation: 5.6
How recently did you update?
Properties can have multiple columns and it was ambiguous whether you were
setting the name or adding an extra one, I've since updated the code to make
it a bit clearer. If I remember correctly your Apply should contain:
target.ColumnNames.Clear(); // make sure there
Read the wiki: http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/FluentConfiguration
2009/3/14 Rub ruboard@gmail.com
How can I work with fluent nhibernate class maps and hbm (embedded
resource files) together in FH?
On 14 мар, 21:02, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
You can't
You need to use Access.AsField() to inform FNH that the readonly property is
backed by a field.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Mike Chaliy m...@chaliy.name wrote:
In our development we are frequently using readonly properties backed
with private fields.
Is there any way to automap such
of making the IPropertyConvention only
apply if I've not already explicitly specified a column name.
On Mar 14, 9:58 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
If your column names are sometimes reserved words, you can wrap them in
backticks. So you could remove the explicit column name from
No problem :)
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, JohnRudolfLewis johnrle...@gmail.comwrote:
Duh... Thanks.
On Mar 14, 10:17 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong with this:
public bool Accept(IProperty target)
{
return (target.ColumnNames.List().Count == 0
BuildSessionFactory(), simple, I just need NHibernate.Configuration.
On 14 мар, 21:55, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Read the wiki:http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/FluentConfiguration
2009/3/14 Rub ruboard@gmail.com
How can I work with fluent nhibernate class maps
The key to what paul said is private auto properties. Use an autoproperty,
not a field.
private string PasswordHash { get; set; }
instead of
private string PasswordHash;
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Nick Gieschen nickgiesc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
Not sure what you mean by this. As far
NHibernate.Configuration object from some Fluent
NHibernate classes?
On 15 мар, 00:01, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
You can either pass an existing instance into the Fluently.Configure
method,
or you can use BuildConfiguration.
2009/3/14 Rub ruboard@gmail.com
How can I
;}}
}
On Mar 14, 7:00 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
You need to use Access.AsField() to inform FNH that the readonly property
is
backed by a field.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Mike Chaliy m...@chaliy.name wrote:
In our development we are frequently using
://stackoverflow.com/questions/645918/what-is-the-best-practice-for-readonly-lists-in-nhibernate
On Mar 15, 12:20 am, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
You should be able to do this with a convention:
public class AccessAsFieldConvention : IPropertyConvention
{
public bool Accept
Consider it fixed. There's now a NotFound property on HasMany and
HasManyToMany.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Adam Dymitruk adymit...@gmail.com wrote:
Would a temporary work-around using views help?
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Andrew Burns erebus...@gmail.com wrote:
I also asked
...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the purpose of the Accept() method then if it's not to ignore
certain properties?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
Although the idea is sound, it unfortunately won't work as there's no way
to ignore properties through
Could you show me some example classes? I don't want to make suggestions
until I know exactly what you're trying to do.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Bill agilemeis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a entity which has a list of Child1 objects. The mappings seem
to work fine for this. If I
()
{
return base.GetHashCode();
}
}
If I get this to work then I have additional levels to add as you can
see about with ShipmentList and EventList.
thanks!!
Bill
On Mar 15, 2:03 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
Could you show me some example classes
It looks correct.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Sushant mpsk2...@gmail.com wrote:
Is my CODE correct? and Should I use SQL Server CE instead.. will it
work there?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
There's a TableName property in IClassMap, so you could do: return
string.IsNullOrEmpty(target.TableName)
Similarly there's a GetColumnName() method on IIdentityPart.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:07 PM, JohnRudolfLewis johnrle...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a domain entity class with a silly long
That looks like a bug. Have you updated recently? Because that looks
like an outdated syntax.
On 3/17/09, Bill agilemeis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've seen some examples of a one-to-many relationship using a
composite key in Fluent. I was looking at the mapping xml file that
was generated
an autoproperty, not a field.
My question then is why hasn't field access been implemented? Is there
a theoretical reason for not implementing it or is it a bug or just
something that hasn't been implemented yet?
On Mar 14, 12:03 pm, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
The key to what paul
What do you mean for a single session? As far as mappings are concerned, you
either set it or you don't.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Tom Warnat war...@mauve.de wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to set for a single session LazyLoad = false?
I tried to set it with SetAttribute(“lazy”,
, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean for a single session? As far as mappings are concerned,
you
either set it or you don't.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Tom Warnat war...@mauve.de wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to set for a single session LazyLoad = false
I think that's the only way currently, yes.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:24 PM, brendanjerwin brendanjer...@gmail.comwrote:
Am I missing the fluent way to get optional=true on the join element?
Is m.SetAttribute(optional,true) the best current way?
The wiki is full of information on the new conventions:
http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/Conventions
Best approach is to not use the PersistenceModel directly like you are, use
the Fluent Configuration.
http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/show/FluentConfiguration
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:16
Looks like an oversight, unfortunately!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:52 PM, brown-cow colbysbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to do a mapping for a Set of Components on an entity.
Here's the mapping I have right now:
...
HasMany(x = x.Properties)
.AsSet()
I've committed this change.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:11 PM, James Gregory jagregory@gmail.comwrote:
Well, I've 3 hours before I leave so you might see it before then.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:07 PM, brown-cow colbysbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, good to know. Thanks for the quick reply
That looks correct to me. I guess the naming is not very revealing, but what
they PrimaryKeyConvention actually does is sets the *column name* of the
primary key, not what the property should be called. So you still need to
use the FindIdentity method to tell the automapper what your identities
201 - 300 of 1142 matches
Mail list logo
