At 10:35 AM -0700 9/23/01, FLUXLIST-digest wrote:
>I don't want to drag this out, but (in a pure desire for knowledge) I
>would be interested in any refutation of Chomsky that doesn't resort to
>*ad hominem* remarks ... because I haven't seen one (a refutation, that
>is) that hews to the same leve
>
>I did, in fact, look at your sources. Not exactly the most unbiased sources
>of info on the middle east (yes, even Amnesty International!) in my opinion.
>Noam Chomsky?! Oh the pain. But of course I always take as gospel whatever
>Ted Koppel says...
well for the sake of credibility why not h
Yes, second-order realities suck. Makes people highly irresponsible with
the first-order one.
I would be nostalgic for the old left if the old left hadn't been so
often self-destructively fuckheaded. I remember the days when the coop
food movement was riven with ideological factions, one taking o
# Above skyscrapers,
Walking on the sidewalk, hotter than a match head
Arms held out in your Jesus Christ pose
here come the man with the look in his eye
This desperation Dislocation Separation Condemnation
Revelation In temptation Isolation Desolation
from history's unmarked grave of discarded l
4 matches
Mail list logo
