Good one Rod!!
The Twelve Noble Moots [Meditation-0022]
Consider the 12 fluxus ideas of Ken Friedman
Is 12 the right number?
Is it really some greater or lesser number?
Is it actually some other group of criteria?
Is there actually any criteria for determinng a fluxus work's fluxicity?
Explain.
BTW:
I also agree with Ken Friedmans definition,
which may in fact be the best of all, as it accomplishes both succinctness and
inclusiveness:
globalism,
the unity of art and life,
intermedia,
experimentalism,
chance,
playfulness,
simplicity,
implicativeness,
exemplativism,
specificity,
Hi Al(l)(e/a)n,
Yes I am impressed with Ken's clear and direct thinking in a lot of his
essays. I think he is really great. The bad part about it is, it is so
clear that one tends not to question it and I wonder about that. I mean
I wonder is it actually 12 or did he just like that number. Or
I have a few more thoughts to add to this discussion, which I think is good.
George and Dick Higgins did not always agree to what Fluxus was and I do not
think we need to agree. Dick was joint with George in developing Fluxus
philosophy or aesthetics and I think Ken Friedman is the rightful
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Boyd
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:04 PM
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: Re: [fluxnexus] Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXUS AND THE PLASTIC ARTS
I have a few more thoughts to add to this discussion, which I think
5 matches
Mail list logo
