What about this: the first link points to a video. At 11:35 of that
video, a verbal and algebraic version of a problem are given. My
feeling is that they are subtly different, in that the algebraic version
allows for 169 as a solution. Actually, the fact that the verbal
statement actually
On 7/15/2012 2:48 PM, Tomasz Rola wrote:
Not really. Install Python, run interpreter and in black window type:
print Hello worldEnter
and you are done.
Or, install Racket, run it and in the interpreter subwindow type
(display Hello world)Enter
and you are done again. Even better, Racket
@BGB, if the braces around the letters defers execution, as my memories
of Perl confirm, this is perfect. With APL, quoting an expression
accomplishes the same end: '1+1'
On another note, I agree with the thesis that OO is just message passing:
aResult ← someParameters 'messageName'