What about this: the first link points to a video. At 11:35 of that
video, a verbal and algebraic version of a problem are given. My
feeling is that they are subtly different, in that the algebraic version
allows for 169 as a solution. Actually, the fact that the verbal
statement actually solves for x^2, not x, is of note as well.
On 5/29/2013 3:52 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:59 AM, karl ramberg <[email protected]> wrote:
Bret Victor have made available some nice demonstrations of uses of a _very_
Frank like system. In one he is visualizing Gezira and Nile by Dan Amelang
http://worrydream.com/#!/MediaForThinkingTheUnthinkable
http://worrydream.com/#!/DrawingDynamicVisualizationsTalk
http://worrydream.com/#!/MediaForThinkingTheUnthinkable
Thank you, Karl!
The first one and the third one seem to point to the same page. Did
you meant to put a link to another page?
--
-- Yoshiki
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | If the string is too tight, it will snap
|\\| [email protected]| If it is too loose, it won't play...
BSc(Math) UNBF '83 | APL: If you can say it, it's done.
Natural Born APL'er | I use Real J
Experimental webserver <http://mormac.homeftp.net/?refer=190907>
------------------------------------------------<-NTP>----{ gnat }-
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
