Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-04 Thread karl ramberg
3, 2013 3:18 AM *Subject:* Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps. One issue with the instance development in Squeak is that it is quite fragile. It is easy to pull the building blocks apart and it all falls down like a house of cards. It's currently hard to work on different

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-03 Thread karl ramberg
-- *From:* David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com *To:* Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org *Sent:* Thursday, October 31, 2013 8:58 AM *Subject:* Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps. Instead of 'applications', you have objects you can manipulate

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-03 Thread Alan Kay
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2013 3:18 AM Subject: Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps. One issue with the instance development in Squeak is that it is quite fragile. It is easy to pull the building blocks apart and it all falls down like a house of cards.  It's currently hard

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-03 Thread Tom Novelli
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Josh Grams j...@qualdan.com wrote: On 2013-11-01 10:37AM, Chris Warburton wrote: My dislike of canvas is that it arrogantly presumes that a user agent has a display to be formatted. I used to develop a CMS called ocPortal which got lots of praise from its

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-01 Thread Chris Warburton
David Leibs david.le...@oracle.com writes: Hi Chris, I get your point but I have really grown to dislike that phrase Worse is Better. Worse is never better. Worse is always worse and worse never reduces to better under any set of natural rewrite rules. Yes there are advantages in the short

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-11-01 Thread Chris Warburton
David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Chris Warburton chriswa...@googlemail.com wrote: In the case of an OS, providing a dumb box to draw on is much easier than a complete, complementary suite of MVC/Morphic/etc. components, even though developers are

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Barbour
Instead of 'applications', you have objects you can manipulate (compose, decompose, rearrange, etc.) in a common environment. The state of the system, the construction of the objects, determines not only how they appear but how they behave - i.e. how they influence and observe the world. Task

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread Alan Kay
Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com To: Fundamentals of New Computing fonc@vpri.org Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps. Instead of 'applications', you have objects you can manipulate (compose, decompose, rearrange, etc.) in a common

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread Chris Warburton
Alan Kay alan.n...@yahoo.com writes: One of the interesting misunderstandings was that Apple and then MS didn't really understand the universal viewing mechanism (MVC) so they thought views with borders around them were windows and view without borders were part of desktop publishing, but in

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread Reuben Thomas
n 31 October 2013 17:37, Chris Warburton chriswa...@googlemail.com wrote: …many filesystems have provided metadata facilities over the years, but these have all hit limits which end up being worked around by storing metadata in files, making the FS unnecessarily complex. ReiserFS, from at

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Leibs
Hi Chris, I get your point but I have really grown to dislike that phrase Worse is Better. Worse is never better. Worse is always worse and worse never reduces to better under any set of natural rewrite rules. Yes there are advantages in the short term to being first to market and things that

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Leibs
In the spirit of equivocation when I look at the world we live in and and note the trends then I feel worse, not better. -David Leibs On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:10 AM, David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com wrote: The phrase Worse is better involves an equivocation - the 'worse' and 'better'

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Barbour
:58 AM *Subject:* Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps. Instead of 'applications', you have objects you can manipulate (compose, decompose, rearrange, etc.) in a common environment. The state of the system, the construction of the objects, determines not only how they appear

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Barbour
It can be depressing, certainly, to look at the difference between where we are and where we could be, if we weren't short-sighted and greedy. OTOH, if you look at where we are vs. where we were, I think you can find a lot to be optimistic about. FP and types have slowly wormed their way into many

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread David Barbour
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Chris Warburton chriswa...@googlemail.com wrote: In the case of an OS, providing a dumb box to draw on is much easier than a complete, complementary suite of MVC/Morphic/etc. components, even though developers are forced to implement their own incompatible

Re: [fonc] Task management in a world without apps.

2013-10-31 Thread John Carlson
Essentially a problem oriented window is what you want. In something like Lively Kernel, this becomes a problem oriented widget. On Oct 31, 2013 10:30 AM, Casey Ransberger casey.obrie...@gmail.com wrote: A fun, but maybe idealistic idea: an application of a computer should just be what one