Re: [fonc] goals

2010-07-11 Thread Max OrHai
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Steve Dekorte wrote: > It seems as if each computing culture fails to establish a measure for it's > own goals which leaves it with no means of critically analyzing it's > assumptions resulting in the technical equivalent of religious dogma. From > this perspectiv

Re: [fonc] goals

2010-07-11 Thread John Zabroski
Steve, Something pointed out to me by Microsoft Silverlight -and- Expression Blend architect John Gossman [1] is that eventually these issues get resolved, but the process is pretty ugly. He linked this book as a reference point http://www.amazon.com/Strangest-Man-Quantum-Genius-Farmelo/dp/057122

Re: [fonc] goals

2010-07-11 Thread Steve Dekorte
On 2010-07-11, at 06:18 PM, Jecel Assumpcao Jr. wrote: > It isn't > about making it smaller (though I also love that - ColorForth is one of > my favorite systems) but making it understandable so it can be built by > humans in such a way that it can become vast. Like the Internet. That's a good po

Re: [fonc] goals

2010-07-11 Thread Jecel Assumpcao Jr.
Steve Dekorte wrote on Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:22:29 -0700 > On 2010-07-10, at 12:25 AM, Hans-Martin Mosner wrote: > > For quite some time I've been pondering the duality of the class/instance > > and > > method/context relations. In some sense, a context is an object created by > > instantiating its