Hi,
for the people here in this group:
what are your opinions of .NET?
Its too large, too complex for what it does and I dont like its design.
what of open-source alternatives, such as Mono and Portable.NET / dotGNU?
They cannot keep up with .NET's versions.
what of the Java VM?
Too
Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have any of you boys looked at the type systems involved to do this
sort of thing ?
Would you be so kind as to cite a few references so that I can
understand more about these issues? I have some ideas in mind, but it
would be very useful to compare
Hi,
I'm interested to see if you can achieve the mixture of dynamism and
C compatibilty within the same source language.
Yes, that's a key goal I'm trying to accomplish. I guess time will
tell.
Hi,
Have any of you boys looked at the type systems involved to do this sort of
thing ?
If this was implemented in higher-levels of abstraction we could
introduce
different tagging schemes to support locatives, flonums, etc. This could
lead
to more language features, reduced memory usage and garbage on smaller
hardware and better performance on 64-bit machines that don't need
Aaron Gray wrote:
I met many of the people listed on
http://vpri.org/html/people/team.html
I am getting a 404 on that, try :-
http://vpri.org/html/people/team.htm
Aaron
Works for me. Try again?
The .html is producing a 404, where as the MS8.3 format leftover .htm works.
Aaron
In my experience, parsing C is fairly easy but pre-processing real-
world .c and .h files into something you can then parse is a nightmare.
Its the C preprocessor macros that often make the semantics undecypherable
to a machine process.
Aaron
___
Hi,
Just signed onto fonc mailing list and am also in early stages of looking at MS
VC porting of idc.
Basically your going to have to do a #ifdef for the MS platforms.
you need a comma and also a __VA_ARGS__ rather than a ##ARG, something like :-
#ifndef _MSC_VER
#define _send(MSG, RCV,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Krzysztof Kowalczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Krzysztof Kowalczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The other form works for both msvc and gcc (see
http://codepad.org/VxF4pBHg for a proof (well, a proof that it
compiles with gcc, or at least a version of
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Michael FIG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Aaron Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
va_start( ap, rcv);
_c = (struct __closure *) _libid-bind( msg, _r);
ret = (_c-method)( (oop) _c, _r, _r, ap);
va_end( ap);
This changes the calling
