No, I do not accept this. I do not think it is in the project's best
interests, I do not think it is in computer science's best interests,
and I do not think it is in the public interest. That is why I am
banging on the door (nice phrase) and trying to persuade them
otherwise. (Note: not
On 20 December 2010 13:42, Brian Gilman brian.gil...@gmail.com wrote:
Just because you believe that Release early, release often is the best
release strategy, doesn't mean that everyone at VPRI does.
I really don't understand comments like this. Fairly obviously I know
that not everyone at
On 21/12/2010, at 2:01 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
They don't have to answer any questions, or indeed demands. (Pardon me
if I err, but I've noticed no active participant from VPRI in this
thread, quite possibly because, as I admit, I've made the same point
before, rather more gently, which is
True. If I'm writing code I probably want to be sitting at a desk to do it.
And I imagine Gauss or Euler sitting at a desk in the middle ages
writing on parchment, not trying to scribble something down on a
notebook while barreling down the streets in their equivalent of a
daily commute.
Still,
To see how far you can scale visual node programming I recommend looking at
Pure Data, Quartz Composer, and LabView. Also interesting is Little Big Planet.
On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Brian Gilman wrote:
Clearly there are some gaps in the programming models of this new era.
How can people
2010/12/20 Murat Girgin gir...@gmail.com:
Perhaps someone from VPRI should comment and explain their reasons of not
releasing much, and certainly not often.
They did comment last time I raised the same question, so you can
check the archives. If they are of the same mind now, there's little
On 20 December 2010 22:38, Ross Kendle ross.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
I value the opportunity to engage with the members of the VPRI team through
this list.
And how much engagement do you get? Not a lot, if you look at the
number of posts by VPRI members to this list, though what little does
On 21/12/2010, at 4:51 AM, Steve Wart wrote:
So is there anything interesting from a FONC perspective in mobile
devices? It may be a coincidence that Apple's success with the iPhone
is to a large extent due to a Smalltalk-derived C dialect, but most
people who know Smalltalk would agree that
On 21/12/2010, at 6:07 AM, Brian Gilman wrote:
I think that the fundamental problem is that keyboards are good for entering
text, and text scales very well.
Artists and musicians tend to heavily favor visual node based programming,
which is a better fit for mobile platforms. Just drag
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.net wrote:
On 21/12/2010, at 4:51 AM, Steve Wart wrote:
So is there anything interesting from a FONC perspective in mobile
devices? It may be a coincidence that Apple's success with the iPhone
is to a large extent due to a
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Julian Leviston jul...@leviston.net wrote:
On 21/12/2010, at 12:00 PM, Steve Wart wrote:
I used Objective-C pretty much every day for the past 2 years, but for
the past 6 months I've been coding in Smalltalk (good old
VisualWorks/Envy and GemStone) again.
11 matches
Mail list logo
