Michael FIG wrote:
Hi,

Nathan Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I was hoping to toy with this some, and start in on adapting an arm
backend...

Cool!  I'd be more than happy to help with this process, if you need
any assistance at all.  I think most of it should be relatively
straightforward by staring at the patch to CodeGenerator-i386.st.
Yes, i've spent the past few days staring at it, alongside the original -i386 and the -arm generators, and think it's sufficiently stared at for a reasonable understanding of how it will come together.

unfortunately, the patch does not want to apply, as it seems to
expect a different jolt2/boot.k then what is in svn r407.  Perhaps I
need another of your patches as well, beyond just jolt2-fixes?
Could you tell me which?

Actually, I just described the patch requirements really badly.  The
idea is:

$ svn checkout -r407 ...
$ cd idst
$ patch -p0 < ../jolt2-fixes.patch
$ patch -p0 < ../jolt2-slink.patch

I've attached new versions of these patches that fix a few issues
(forgot the '{...} grammar syntax in jolt2-fixes.patch, mangle Jolt
names that can't be directly expressed in the output) and demonstrates
the use of (syntax ...) in function/examples2/slink/main.k.
Yup, it looks like this jolt2-fixes patch should resolve the problem I was running into with the slink patch. I'll let you know how it goes from here!

Thanks much,
--Nathan

Good luck,

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to