Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.4 Release Candidate available

2002-06-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi all, I was just wondering why the distributions are so large and also larger than the previous release. The src release contains the generated html and javadocs which is about an extra 2.5Mb compressed (18Mb uncompressed). The bin release contains the xml-docs and the html-docs, ant.jar and

Re: Design Documentation Question

2002-06-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi Dave, On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 15:02, David Penton wrote: I'm just trying to get familiar with fop design, with the ultimate intention of participating. I have two questions. I got the source from cvs. I am looking in xml-fop/docs/design and also xml-fop/docs/design/alt.design but it

Re: FOP in the forrest

2002-06-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 22:22, J.Pietschmann wrote: Christian Geisert wrote: Keiron Liddle schrieb: Any questions, comments? I'm already adapting the docs to the forrest 1.1 DTDs Thanks. There are some issues with the (old) documentation for the maintenance branch which I will bring

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.4 Release Candidate available

2002-06-24 Thread Durai Murugan
Yes, The file is so large and takes hours to download. It can be distributed by dicritizing the elements of FOP package. So that it can downloaded when required. durai --- Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was just wondering why the distributions are so large and also

Loading FOP userconfig file from EAR

2002-06-24 Thread Toulson, Simon
I am using fop 0.20.3 as part of a web server application, distributed as an EAR file, running under weblogic 6.1. Unfortunately we are not able to distribute the application to our production servers in any other form. We have our own userconfig.xml file which specifies the fonts used by

[GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2002-06-24 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-24/xml-fop.html Buildfile: build.xml init-avail: init-filters-xalan2: [copy] Copying 1

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - xml-fop

2002-06-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi, On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 15:20, Sam Ruby wrote: [style] Transforming into /home/rubys/jakarta/xml-fop/build/src/org/apache/fop/render/pdf/fonts [style] Processing /home/rubys/jakarta/xml-fop/src/codegen/CourierBold.xml to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10179] New: - fo:basic-links don't work in region-after areas.

2002-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Aw: PDF JavaScript and Form Fields: FOP prototype version is available

2002-06-24 Thread Holger Evers
I found FOP when searching a possibility for setting up a pdf-servlet-server. Like almost all of us, i also want to use form fields in my pdf's. Unfortunately i was not able to integrate your changes in the 0.20.3 or 0.20.4rc version of FOP, obviously there's missing the 'addField'-method

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] FOP 0.20.4 Release Candidate available

2002-06-24 Thread Keiron Liddle
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 22:36, J.Pietschmann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it me, or do the examples in fop-0.20.4rc/docs/examples/svg not work. ../../../fop.sh external.fo external.pdf [INFO] FOP 0.20.4rc [INFO] building formatting object tree [Fatal Error] external.fo:79:81:

Re: Loading FOP userconfig file from EAR

2002-06-24 Thread J.Pietschmann
Toulson, Simon wrote: We have our own userconfig.xml file which specifies the fonts used by Fop. Unfortunately the loading of this file always fails. That's easy to see, the userconfig has to be a real file. You can essentially try to copy what is in Options.loadUserconfiguration(File

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10179] - fo:basic-links don't work in region-after areas.

2002-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10179. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8968] - basic-link with internal-destination atribute doesn't work inside static-content element

2002-06-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8968. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr DataTypeNotImplementedException.java FunctionNotImplementedException.java

2002-06-24 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/06/24 15:28:10 Added: src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design DataTypeNotImplementedException.java FunctionNotImplementedException.java Log: Extend PropertyException Revision ChangesPath No

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr PropertyParser.java

2002-06-24 Thread pbwest
pbwest 2002/06/24 15:31:58 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design PropertyParser.java Log: Use FunctionNotImplementedException Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision