pbwest 2002/10/21 09:12:54
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FoLayoutMasterSet.java FoPageSequenceMaster.java
Log:
UriLocalName separated from XMLEvent.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
pbwest 2002/10/21 09:05:15
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
SystemFontFunction.java
Log:
Property classes extracted from fo.Properties to fo.properties.property.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12630.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oleg and Peter,
Here's the latest iteration of the fo schema. Could someone commit it?
The only change is to allow % in length attributes.
I believe that the schematron folks are working on a schematron
validator that works as an extension to the schema (By adding schematron
extensions to the
pbwest 2002/10/21 09:07:32
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
PropertyParser.java
Log:
Use PropertyConsts.pconsts singleton.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
I downloaded fop-0.20.4 with sources.
I fund several files missing for example:
org.apache.fop.render.pdf.CodePointMapping (not in repository to )
or entire catalog org
org.apache.fop.fo.properties (need to search, but founded
in repository)
To me it's a serious problem, becouse I'm
pbwest 2002/10/21 09:15:04
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
PageSequenceMaster.java
Log:
Separated property classes from fo.Properties to fo.properties.property.
Revision ChangesPath
No
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13807.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Marcin Zawadzki wrote:
If somebody is working on property page-break-inside ?
No. Its way down the priority list because its basically redundant.
The only sensoble setting is page-break-inside=avoid, which is the
same as keep-together=always, simply replace it. Keep in mind
that keep-together
Marcin Zawadzki wrote:
I downloaded fop-0.20.4 with sources.
I fund several files missing for example:
org.apache.fop.render.pdf.CodePointMapping (not in repository to )
or entire catalog org
org.apache.fop.fo.properties (need to search, but founded in repository)
To me it's a serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have rendered PDF docs using FOP from a DTD, XML XSL files and this works
fineI have no designed a XSD and I get the following error message.
[ERROR] The markup declarations contained or pointed to by the document type
declaration must be well-formed.
I suspect
Oleg
I have rendered PDF docs using FOP from a DTD, XML XSL files and this works
fineI have no designed a XSD and I get the following error message.
[ERROR] The markup declarations contained or pointed to by the document type
declaration must be well-formed.
All the file are well formed
Jeremias wrote:
I'm planning to write a testcase that runs multiple FOPs
simultaneously to find out where the buggers are.
Jeremias,
What kind of FOPs are we talking about?
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
Lord, to whom shall we go?
If somebody is working on property
"page-break-inside" ?
Our company need this property to work with
fop, so probably I'll have to implement this.
MZ
While working on a patch I ran the generation of the fo examples in
docs/examples and noticed various warnings and errors being displayed (see
below).
I also noticed that the testsuite generation doesn't seem to work at all
(test/createpdf.sh).
Is it worthwhile cleaning this up? I have some time
Manuel,
My vote? Please Fix! Please Fix! New users like me live and die by
these demos and when they don't work I assume that it's my fault and
not the demo code. Demos that don't work confuse when they are really
there to educate. That's my vote.
-M
On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 07:38
16 matches
Mail list logo