cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Root.java

2002-12-22 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/22 16:01:56 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination Root.java Log: Made fields private. Revision ChangesPath 1.23 +3 -7 xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination/Root.java Index: Root.java =

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination LayoutMasterSet.java PageMasterReference.java PageNumberGenerator.java PageSequenceMaster.java Region.java RegionAfter.java RegionBA.java RegionBASE.java RegionBefore.java RegionBody.java RegionEnd.java RegionSE.java RegionStart.java Root.java SimplePageMaster.java

2002-12-22 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/22 15:37:06 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/pagination LayoutMasterSet.java PageMasterReference.java PageNumberGenerator.java PageSequenceMaster.java Region.java RegionAfter.java RegionBA.java RegionBA

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/tools AreaTreeBuilder.java

2002-12-22 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/22 14:40:31 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps LayoutHandler.java src/org/apache/fop/area AreaTree.java CachedRenderPagesModel.java src/org/apache/fop/tools AreaTreeBuilder.java Added: src/org/apache/fop/area Are

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/txt TXTRenderer.java

2002-12-22 Thread olegt
olegt 2002/12/22 13:40:08 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/render/txt Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain TXTRenderer.java Log: Fixed NPE when options or encoding are null. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision

Re: bidi in the branch

2002-12-22 Thread Peter B. West
Oleg Tkachenko wrote: Peter B. West wrote: I would encourage Oleg to bring this functionality into HEAD. If it already exists in Oleg's working copy of the maint branch (for reasons which have frequently been canvassed here), I think it would be churlish of us to deny access to our faithful

Re: bidi in the branch

2002-12-22 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Peter B. West wrote: I would encourage Oleg to bring this functionality into HEAD. If it already exists in Oleg's working copy of the maint branch (for reasons which have frequently been canvassed here), I think it would be churlish of us to deny access to our faithful band of users. May be,

Re: bidi in the branch

2002-12-22 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
Jeremias Maerki wrote: :-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the trunk. afaik the trunk is much more suited for bidi, while implementing it for the branch is really a sentence :) I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong message IMO. But I'm looking