Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glen, what are your
plans for
apps/FOInputHandler? Will it be going away or get
renamed anyway? I have
been using Handler as related to SAX events, and
it looks like we have it
also being used as I/O in a more raw form.
From: Glen Mazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip/
(a) Don't include force patch at all -- only have this
option for 1.0. Argument for this: Haven't had too
many requests for it, we can continue as-is until 1.0.
Since no one else has answered I hope you dont object to me posting an
opinion.
I would
Victor--
After looking over the new design, I like it. Please
keep your FOInputHandler abstract base class as-named.
FOTreeHandler also is a very good name.
I'd like to keep, however, at least for the time
being, the naming convention in fop.apps with
InputHandler as well. It's the command
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21420.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
gmazza 2003/07/30 15:01:35
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs anttask.xml
src/java/org/apache/fop/tools/anttasks Fop.java
Log:
Patch 21381: New force attribute added to FOP task, update to documentation.
Submitted by: Sean Gilligan (seanlist at msgilligan dot
gmazza 2003/07/30 22:14:29
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/apps XSLTInputHandler.java
Removed: src/java/org/apache/fop/apps TraxInputHandler.java
Log:
XSLTInputHandler reimplemented using TraxInputHandler code. TraxInputHandler
removed. (Retaining XSLTInputHandler because
